Emirati Journal of Civil Engineering and Applications

Browse Journals

Articles

مجلد 3 عدد 1 (2025): Emirati Journal of Civil Engineering and Applications

A critical review on the performance of column improved ground under shear and seismic loading

  • Rashma R.S.V
  • Jayalekshmi B.R
  • Shivashankar R
مقدم
February 19, 2025
منشور
2025-03-26

الملخص

This paper reviews the performance of conventional stone column improved ground under static shear conditions and seismic loading. The limitations of stone columns in resisting lateral spreading due to shear movements and ground motions are detailed from extensive literature review. Suggestions for improving the shear resistance of improved ground with alternatives to stone column are incorporated. The better performance of pervious concrete column as an alternative to stone column under static shear and seismic loading is also briefed. 

المراجع

  1. Barksdale RD, Bachus RC (1983) Design and constrcution of stone columns volume 1,FHWA-RD-83-026 Final Report. Federal Highway Administration
  2. Kitazume M, Maruyama K (2007) Internal Stability of Group Column Type Deep Mixing Improved Ground Under Embankment Loading. Soils and Foundations 47:437–455. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf.47.437
  3. Han J (2014) Development of Ground Column Technologies. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Ground Improvement 1-19 http://dx.doi.org/101680/grim1300016 168:
  4. Shrestha S, Chai JC, Bergado DT, et al (2015) 3D FEM investigation on Bending failure mechanism of column inclusion under embankment load. Lowland Technology International 17:157–166. https://doi.org/10.14247/lti.17.3_157
  5. Noorzad A, Poorooshasb HB, Madhav MR (2007) Performance of partially penetrating stone columns during an earthquake. Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium on Numerical Models in Geomechanics NUMOG 10 - Numerical Models in Geomechanics NUMOG 10 503–508. https://doi.org/10.1201/noe0415440271.ch73
  6. Youd TL (2018) Application of MLR Procedure for Prediction of Liquefaction-Induced Lateral Spread Displacement. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering 144:04018033. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)gt.1943-5606.0001860
  7. Murugesan S, Rajagopal K (2009) Shear load tests on stone columns with and without geosynthetic encasement. Geotechnical Testing Journal 32:76–85
  8. Mohapatra SR, Rajagopal K, Sharma J (2016) Direct shear tests on geosynthetic-encased granular columns. Geotextiles and Geomembranes 44:396–405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2016.01.002
  9. Mohapatra SR, Rajagopal K, Sharma J (2017) 3-Dimensional numerical modeling of geosynthetic-encased granular columns. Geotextiles and Geomembranes 45:131–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2017.01.004
  10. Seed H, Booker J (1978) Stabilization of Potential Liquefiable Sand Deposits Using Gravel Drains
  11. Baez JI (1995) A Design Model for the Reduction of Soil Liquefaction by Vibro-Stone Columns,PhD dissertation. University of Southern California Digital Library
  12. Ashford SA, Rollins KM, Case Bradford VS, et al (2000) Liquefaction mitigation using stone columns around deep foundations: Full-scale test results. Transportation Research Record 110–118. https://doi.org/10.3141/1736-14
  13. Adalier K, Elgamal A, Meneses J, Baez JI (2003) Stone columns as liquefaction countermeasure in non-plastic silty soils. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 23:571–584. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0267-7261(03)00070-8
  14. Elgamal A, Lu J, Forcellini D (2009) Mitigation of liquefaction-induced lateral deformation in a sloping stratum: Three-dimensional numerical simulation. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering 135:1672–1682. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000137
  15. Krishna AM (2011) Mitigation of liquefaction hazard using granular piles. International Journal of Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering 2:44–66. https://doi.org/10.4018/jgee.2011010104
  16. Zhang Y, Zhang X (2011) Dynamic response analysis of liquefaction foundation treated by stone columns. In: 2011 International Conference on Electric Technology and Civil Engineering, ICETCE 2011 - Proceedings. pp 254–257
  17. Kolekar YA, Mir OS, S.Murty D (2011) Behaviour of Stone Column Reinforced Marine Clay under Static and Cyclic Loading. In: Proceedings of Indian Geotechnical Conference, December 15-17. pp 429–432
  18. Lu J, Elgamal A, Yang Z, Diego S (2011) OpenSeesPL Three-Dimensional Lateral Pile-Ground Interaction, User’s Manual, Version 1.00
  19. Asgari A, Oliaei M, Bagheri M (2013) Numerical simulation of improvement of a liquefiable soil layer using stone column and pile-pinning techniques. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 51:77–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2013.04.006
  20. Raju KVSB, Govinda L, Chandrashekhar AS (2013) Cyclic Response of Stone Columns. International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research 4:29–32
  21. Murali Krishna A, Madhav MR, Kumar K (2014) Ground Engineering with Granular Inclusions for Loose Saturated Sands Subjected to Seismic Loadings. Indian Geotechnical Journal 44:205–217. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40098-013-0085-z
  22. Rayamajhi D, Nguyen T v, Ashford SA, et al (2014) Numerical Study of Shear Stress Distribution for Discrete Columns in Liquefiable Soils. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering 140:
  23. Rayamajhi D, Boulanger RW, Ashford SA, Elgamal A (2016) Dense granular columns in liquefiable ground. II: Effects on deformations. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering 142:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001475
  24. Zhan Y, Jiang G, Yao H (2014) Dynamic Characteristics of Saturated Silty Soil Ground Treated by Stone Column Composite Foundation. Advances in Materials Science and Engineering. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/745386
  25. Tang L, Cong S, Ling X, et al (2015) Numerical study on ground improvement for liquefaction mitigation using stone columns encased with geosynthetics. Geotextiles and Geomembranes 43:190–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2014.11.011
  26. Tang L, Zhang X, Ling X (2016) Numerical simulation of centrifuge experiments on liquefaction mitigation of silty soils using stone columns. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering 20:631–638. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-015-0363-7
  27. Şahinkaya F, Vekli M, Çadır CC (2017) Numerical analysis under seismic loads of soils improvement with floating stone columns. Natural Hazards 88:891–917. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-017-2897-0
  28. Geng L, Tang L, Cong SY, et al (2017) Three-dimensional analysis of geosynthetic-encased granular columns for liquefaction mitigation. Geosynthetics International 24:45–59. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgein.16.00014
  29. Meshkinghalam H, Hajialilue-Bonab M, Khoshravan Azar A (2017) Numerical investigation of stone columns system for liquefaction and settlement diminution potential. International Journal of Geo-Engineering 8:. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40703-017-0047-x
  30. Pal S, Deb K (2019) Effect of clogging of stone column on drainage capacity during soil liquefaction. Soils and Foundations 59:196–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2018.10.005
  31. Malarvizhi SN, Ilamparuthi K (2004) Load versus settlement of claybed stabilized with stone & reinforced stone columns. Proceedings of the 3 rdAsian Regional Conference on Geosynthetics, GEOASIA 322–329
  32. Raithel M, Kirchner A, Schade C, Leusink E (2005) Foundation of Constructions on Very Soft Soils with Geotextile Encased Columns - State of the Art. In: Innovations in Grouting and Soil Improvement. pp 1–11
  33. Murugesan S, Rajagopal K (2006) Geosynthetic-encased stone columns: Numerical evaluation. Geotextiles and Geomembranes 24:349–358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2006.05.001
  34. Black JA, Sivakumar V, Madhav MR, Hamill GA (2007) Reinforced stone columns in weak deposits: Laboratory model study. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering 133:1154–1161. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2007)133:9(1154)
  35. Wu C sen, Hong YS, Lin HC (2009) Axial stress-strain relation of encapsulated granular column. Computers and Geotechnics 36:226–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2008.01.003
  36. Gniel J, Bouazza A (2009) Improvement of soft soils using geogrid encased stone columns. Geotextiles and Geomembranes 27:167–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2008.11.001
  37. Samadhiya NK, Priti M, Partha B, Bhushan KM (2008) Load - Settlement Characteristics of Granular Piles with Randomly Mixed Fibres. Indian Geotech Journal 38:335–344
  38. Wu C Sen, Hong YS (2009) Laboratory tests on geosynthetic-encapsulated sand columns. Geotextiles and Geomembranes 27:107–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2008.09.003
  39. Shivashankar R, Dheerendra Babu MR, Nayak S, Manjunath R (2010) Stone Columns with Vertical Circumferential Nails: Laboratory Model Study. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering 28:695–706. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-010-9329-1
  40. Fattah MY, Quitaba G M (2012) Finite element analysis of Geogrid encased stone columns. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering 30:713–726
  41. Marto A, Moradi R, Helmi F, et al (2013) Performance analysis of reinforced stone columns using finite element method. Electronic Journal of Geotechnical Engineering 18 B:315–323
  42. Ali K, Shahu JT, Sharma KG (2014) Model Tests on Stone Columns Reinforced with Lateral Circular Discs. International Journal of Civil Engineering Research 5:97–104
  43. Castro J (2017) Groups of encased stone columns: Influence of column length and arrangement. Geotextiles and Geomembranes 45:68–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2016.12.001
  44. Hong Y-S, Wu C-S, Kou C-M, Chang C-H (2017) A numerical analysis of a fully penetrated encased granular column. Geotextiles and Geomembranes 45:391–405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2017.05.002
  45. Zhang W, Li Y, Goh ATC, Zhang R (2020) Numerical study of the performance of jet grout piles for braced excavations in soft clay. Computers and Geotechnics 124:. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2020.103631
  46. ASIRI National Project (2013) Recommendations for the design, construction and control of rigid inclusion ground improvements. Paris : Presses des ponts
  47. Kempfert HG (2003) Ground improvement methods with special emphasis on column-type techniques. In: Int. Workshop on Geotechnics of Soft Soils-Theory and Practice. pp 101–112
  48. Suleiman MT, Ni L, Raich A (2014) Development of Pervious Concrete Pile Ground-Improvement Alternative and Behavior under Vertical Loading. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering 140:4014035. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)gt.1943-5606.0001135
  49. Ni L, Suleiman MT, Raich A (2016) Behavior and Soil-Structure Interaction of Pervious Concrete Ground-Improvement Piles under Lateral Loading. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering 142:4015071. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)gt.1943-5606.0001393
  50. Zheng G, Yang X, Zhou H, Chai J (2018) Numerical modeling of progressive failure of rigid piles under an embankment load
  51. Zhou H, Xu H, Yu X, et al (2021) Evaluation of the Bending Failure of Columns under an Embankment Loading. International Journal of Geomechanics 21:. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)gm.1943-5622.0002057
  52. Mohapatra SR, Rajagopal K (2016) Experimental and numerical modelling of geosynthetic encased stone columns subjected to shear loading. Japanese Geotechnical Society Special Publication 2:2292–2295. https://doi.org/10.3208/jgssp.igs-08
  53. Rashma RSV, Shivashankar R, Jayalekshmi BR (2020) Shear Response of Pervious Concrete Column Improved Ground. Indian Geotechnical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40098-020-00473-9
  54. Rayamajhi D, Ashford SA, Boulanger RW, Elgamal A (2016) Dense granular columns in liquefiable ground. I: Shear reinforcement and cyclic stress ratio reduction. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering 142:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001474
  55. Zhang J, Cui X, Lan R, et al (2017) Dynamic Performance Characteristics of Pervious Concrete Pile Composite Foundations under Earthquake Loads. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities 31:04017064. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)cf.1943-5509.0001056
  56. Rashma R, Jayalekshmi BR, Shivashankar R (2021) Seismic performance of pervious concrete column improved ground in mitigating liquefaction. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering 1114:012015. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/1114/1/012015
  57. Rashma RS v., Jayalekshmi BR, Shivashankar R (2021) Liquefaction Mitigation Potential of Improved Ground Using Pervious Concrete Columns. Indian Geotechnical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40098-021-00536-5

التنزيلات

تنزيل البيانات غير متاح بعد.

المؤلفات المشابهة

1-10 من 12

يمكنك أيضاً إبدأ بحثاً متقدماً عن المشابهات لهذا المؤلَّف.

الأعمال الأكثر قراءة لنفس المؤلف/المؤلفين

1 2 3 4 > >>