Browse Journals
MENU

Confirmatory Exploration of innovation in virtual exchanges through a studyon Virtual Agents

International Journal of Automation and Digital Transformation

Articles

Vol. 3 No. 1 (2024): International Journal of Automation and Digital Transformation

Confirmatory Exploration of innovation in virtual exchanges through a studyon Virtual Agents

  • Yassine Elkhatibi
  • Redouane Benabdeouahed
Submitted
February 29, 2024
Published
2024-02-29

Abstract

The use of Conversational Agents for consumer services continues to grow, and the service industry is no exception. Carried out among 340 Moroccan consumers, this study shows the importance of perceived anthropomorphism, social presence, perceived trust, social influence, perceived cost, and facilitating conditions of a conversational agent in increasing adoption intention using the UTAUT model. The expected effort had no effect. This research confirms the moderating role of age on the relationship between social influence and intention to use, while gender and level of education had no moderating effect. The technology acceptance model tested is a powerful tool for understanding why people do or do not use conversational agents. It can explain nearly 75,8% of the variance in behavioral intention.

Various recommendations are put forward to optimize the design and successful implementation of chatbots, enabling them to take their rightful place among digital tools.

References

  1. Desbiolles JP. Finance et Intelligence artificielle (IA) : d’une révolution industrielle à une révolution humaine ... tout est à repenser... Annales des Mines - Réalités industrielles. 2019;Février 2019(1):5. doi:10.3917/rindu1.191.0005
  2. Lahoual D, Fréjus M. De l’utilisabilité et l’appropriabilité des assistants vocaux. Étudier les interactions vocales en situation domestique à partir d’une démarche centrée utilisateurs. In: ; 2018.
  3. Liu S. Chatbot market revenue worldwide from 2018 to 2027. Statista, http://www.statista.com/statistics/1007392/worldwide-chatbot-market-size. Published online 2020.
  4. Adnan SM, Hamdan A, Alareeni B. Artificial Intelligence for Public Sector: Chatbots as a Customer Service Representative. In: Alareeni B, Hamdan A, Elgedawy I, eds. The Importance of New Technologies and Entrepreneurship in Business Development: In The Context of Economic Diversity in Developing Countries. Vol 194. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems. Springer International Publishing; 2021:164- 173. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-69221-6_13
  5. Ioannides D, Gyimóthy S. The COVID-19 crisis as an opportunity for escaping the unsustainable global tourism path. Tourism Geographies. 2020;22(3):624- 632. doi:10.1080/14616688.2020.1763445
  6. Sidaoui K, Jaakkola M, Burton J. AI feel you: customer experience assessment via chatbot interviews. Journal of Service Management. 2020;31(4):745-766.
  7. Dubois C, Salotti JM, Seminel D, Simonazzi N. Le chatbot : un outil de la relation aux clients. Hermès. 2019;n° 84(2):95. doi:10.3917/herm.084.0095
  8. Huang SYB, Lee CJ, Lee SC. Toward a Unified Theory of Customer Continuance Model for Financial Technology Chatbots. Sensors. 2021;21(17):5687. doi:10.3390/s21175687
  9. Cherif E. La perception et l’utilisation des conseillers virtuels en ligne : Proposition d’un cadre intégrateur. Vie & sciences de l’entreprise. 2016;201(1):146. doi:10.3917/vse.201.0146
  10. Ambawat M, Wadera DD. A REVIEW OF CONSUMERS’ ATTITUDES TOWARDS CHATBOTS ADOPTION.
  11. Luger E, Sellen A. “Like Having a Really Bad PA”: The Gulf between User Expectation and Experience of Conversational Agents. In: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM; 2016:5286-5297. doi:10.1145/2858036.2858288
  12. Fitzpatrick KK, Darcy A, Vierhile M. Delivering cognitive behavior therapy to young adults with symptoms of depression and anxiety using a fully automated conversational agent (Woebot): a randomized controlled trial. JMIR mental health. 2017;4(2):e7785.
  13. Følstad A, Brandtzaeg PB. Users’ experiences with chatbots: findings from a questionnaire study. Qual User Exp. 2020;5(1):3. doi:10.1007/s41233-020- 00033-2
  14. Pillai R, Sivathanu B. Adoption of AI-based chatbots for hospitality and tourism. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management. 2020;32(10):3199-3226.
  15. Lemoine JF, Cherif E. Comment générer de la confiance envers un agent virtuel à l’aide de ses caractéristiques ? Une étude exploratoire. Management & Avenir. 2012;58(8):169. doi:10.3917/mav.058.0169
  16. Diederich S, Brendel AB, Morana S, Kolbe L. On the design of and interaction with conversational agents: An organizing and assessing review of humancomputer interaction research. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 2022;23(1):96-138.
  17. Turing AM. The Essential Turing. Oxford University Press; 2004.
  18. Adamopoulou E, Moussiades L. Chatbots: History, technology, and applications. Machine Learning with Applications. 2020;2:100006. doi:10.1016/j.mlwa.2020.100006
  19. Lemoine JF. Du E-Marketing au Marketing Digital. Management Avenir. 2015;N° 82(8):123-127.
  20. Kasilingam DL. Understanding the attitude and intention to use smartphone chatbots for shopping. Technology in Society. 2020;62:101280. doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101280
  21. Cherif E. La perception et l’utilisation des conseillers virtuels en ligne : Proposition d’un cadre intégrateur: Vie & sciences de l’entreprise. 2016;N° 201(1):146- 166. doi:10.3917/vse.201.0146
  22. Viot C, Bressolles G. Les agents virtuels intelligents : quels atouts pour la relation client ? DM. 2012;65:45- 56. doi:10.7193/DM.065.45.56
  23. Benbasat I, Barki H, Montréal H. Quo Vadis TAM. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. Published online 2007:211-218.
  24. Harnischmacher C, Herrenkind B, Weilbier L. Yesterday, Today, and Tomorrow-Perspectives on Green Information Systems Research Streams. In: ECIS. ; 2020. Accessed December 15, 2023. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Christine-Harnischmacher/publication/341453952_Yesterday_T oday_and_Tomorrow_- _Perspectives_on_Green_Information_Systems_Research_Streams/links/5ec26b86a6fdcc90d67e1cfe/Yester day-Today-and-Tomorrow-Perspectives-on-GreenInformation-Systems-Research-Streams.pdf
  25. Mehra A, Rajput S, Paul J. Determinants of adoption of latest version smartphones: Theory and evidence. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2022;175:121410. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121410
  26. Sebei M. Diffusion du commerce électronique en Tunisie: une analyse et modélisation des comportements d’adoption de l’internet et des services marchands par les jeunes. :384.
  27. Venkatesh, Morris, Davis, Davis. User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View. MIS Quarterly. 2003;27(3):425. doi:10.2307/30036540
  28. Cheikho A. - Cas de la banque mobile -. :404.
  29. Chang A. UTAUT and UTAUT 2: A Review and Agenda for Future Research. The Winners. 2012;13(2):10. doi:10.21512/tw.v13i2.656
  30. Igbaria M. User acceptance of microcomputer technology: An empirical test. Omega. 1993;21(1):73- 90. doi:10.1016/0305-0483(93)90040-R
  31. Cherif E, Lemoine JF. Les conseillers virtuels anthropomorphes et les réactions des internautes : une expérimentation portant sur la voix du conseiller. Recherche et Applications en Marketing (French Edition). 2019;34(1):29-49. doi:10.1177/0767370118775963
  32. Burgoon JK, Bonito JA, Bengtsson B, Cederberg C, Lundeberg M, Allspach L. Interactivity in human– computer interaction: a study of credibility, understanding, and influence. Computers in Human Behavior. 2000;16(6):553-574. doi:10.1016/S0747- 5632(00)00029-7
  33. Qiu L, Benbasat I. Evaluating Anthropomorphic Product Recommendation Agents: A Social Relationship Perspective to Designing Information Systems. Journal of Management Information Systems. 2009;25(4):145-182. doi:10.2753/MIS0742- 1222250405
  34. Ben Mimoun MS, Poncin I, Garnier M. Animated conversational agents and e-consumer productivity: The roles of agents and individual characteristics. Information & Management. 2017;54(5):545-559. doi:10.1016/j.im.2016.11.008
  35. Cherif E, Lemoine JF. Les conseillers virtuels anthropomorphes et les réactions des internautes: une expérimentation portant sur la voix du conseiller. Recherche et Applications en Marketing (French Edition). 2019;34(1):29-49.
  36. Qiu L, Benbasat I. A study of demographic embodiments of product recommendation agents in electronic commerce. International Journal of HumanComputer Studies. 2010;68(10):669-688. doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2010.05.005
  37. Moon Y. Intimate Exchanges: Using Computers to Elicit Self‐Disclosure From Consumers. J CONSUM RES. 2000;26(4):323-339. doi:10.1086/209566
  38. Lemoine JF, Zafri R. INFLUENCE DE LA TYPOGRAPHIE D’UN SITE WEB MARCHAND SUR LES RÉACTIONS DE L’INTERNAUTE : UNE ÉTUDE EXPLORATOIRE. :7.
  39. Gambino A, Fox J, Ratan RA. Building a stronger CASA: Extending the computers are social actors paradigm. Human-Machine Communication. 2020;1:71-85.
  40. Jacquinot P, Pellissier-Tanon A. L’intégrité au fondement de la confiance et de la bienveillance. Une alternative à l’Homme opportuniste. RIMHE : Revue Interdisciplinaire Management, Homme & Entreprise. 2018;31(2):71. doi:10.3917/rimhe.031.0071
  41. Araujo T. Living up to the chatbot hype: The influence of anthropomorphic design cues and communicative agency framing on conversational agent and company perceptions. Computers in Human Behavior. 2018;85:183-189. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2018.03.051
  42. Mimoun MSB, Poncin I. Agents virtuels vendeurs: que veulent les consommateurs ? :8.
  43. Venkatesh, Thong, Xu. Consumer Acceptance and Use of Information Technology: Extending the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology. MIS Quarterly. 2012;36(1):157. doi:10.2307/41410412
  44. Hanafizadeh P, Behboudi M, Abedini Koshksaray A, Jalilvand Shirkhani Tabar M. Mobile-banking adoption by Iranian bank clients. Telematics and Informatics. 2014;31(1):62-78. doi:10.1016/j.tele.2012.11.001
  45. Bazi S, Filieri R, Gorton M. Customers’ motivation to engage with luxury brands on social media. Journal of Business Research. 2020;112:223-235.
  46. Balakrishnan J, Abed SS, Jones P. The role of metaUTAUT factors, perceived anthropomorphism, perceived intelligence, and social self-efficacy in chatbot-based services? Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2022;180:121692. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121692
  47. Shum H yeung, He X dong, Li D. From Eliza to XiaoIce: challenges and opportunities with social chatbots. Frontiers Inf Technol Electronic Eng. 2018;19(1):10-26. doi:10.1631/FITEE.1700826
  48. Gursoy D, Chi OH, Lu L, Nunkoo R. Consumers acceptance of artificially intelligent (AI) device use in service delivery. International Journal of Information Management. 2019;49:157-169. doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.03.008
  49. Mogaji E, Balakrishnan J, Nwoba AC, Nguyen NP. Emerging-market consumers’ interactions with banking chatbots. Telematics and Informatics. 2021;65:101711. doi:10.1016/j.tele.2021.101711
  50. Malle BF, Ullman D. A multidimensional conception and measure of human-robot trust. In: Trust in HumanRobot Interaction. Elsevier; 2021:3-25. Accessed December 15, 2023. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B97 80128194720000010
  51. Komiak SX, Benbasat I. Understanding customer trust in agent-mediated electronic commerce, web-mediated electronic commerce, and traditional commerce. Information technology and management. 2004;5:181- 207.
  52. Qiu L, Benbasat I. Online consumer trust and live help interfaces: The effects of text-to-speech voice and three-dimensional avatars. International journal of human-computer interaction. 2005;19(1):75-94.
  53. Simpson JA. Foundations of interpersonal trust. Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles. 2007;2:587- 607.
  54. Fernandez-Gago C, Moyano F, Lopez J. Modelling trust dynamics in the Internet of Things. Information Sciences. 2017;396:72-82. doi:10.1016/j.ins.2017.02.039
  55. Hossain MA, Hasan MI, Chan C, Ahmed JU. Predicting user acceptance and continuance behaviour towards location-based services: the moderating effect of facilitating conditions on behavioural intention and actual use. Australasian Journal of Information Systems. 2017;21. Accessed December 10, 2023. http://journal.acs.org.au/index.php/ajis/article/view/1454
  56. Verkijika SF. Factors influencing the adoption of mobile commerce applications in Cameroon. Telematics and Informatics. 2018;35(6):1665-1674.
  57. Hamari J, Sjöklint M, Ukkonen A. The sharing economy: Why people participate in collaborative consumption. Asso for Info Science & Tech. 2016;67(9):2047-2059. doi:10.1002/asi.23552
  58. AMBARWATI R, HARJA YD, THAMRIN S. The role of facilitating conditions and user habits: a case of Indonesian online learning platform. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business (JAFEB). 2020;7(10):481-489.
  59. Kasilingam DL. Understanding the attitude and intention to use smartphone chatbots for shopping. Technology in Society. 2020;62:101280.
  60. Kwateng KO, Atiemo KAO, Appiah C. Acceptance and use of mobile banking: an application of UTAUT2. Journal of enterprise information management. Published online 2018.
  61. Chawla D, Joshi H. Role of demographics as moderator in mobile banking adoption. Published online 2017.
  62. Phellas CN, Bloch A, Seale C. Structured methods: interviews, questionnaires and observation. Researching society and culture. 2011;3(1):23-32.
  63. Mahwadha WI. Behavioral intention of young consumers towards e-wallet adoption: An empirical study among indonesian users. Russian Journal of Agricultural and Socio-Economic Sciences. 2019;85(1):79-93.
  64. Arnold A. How chatbots feed into millennials’ need for instant gratification. Forbes January. 2018;27:2018.
  65. Veiga C, Santos MC, Águas P, Santos JAC. Are millennials transforming global tourism? Challenges for destinations and companies. Worldwide Hospitality and Tourism Themes. 2017;9(6):603-616.
  66. Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS. Experimental Designs Using ANOVA. Vol 724. Thomson/Brooks/Cole Belmont, CA; 2007. Accessed December 10, 2023. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Barbara-Tabachnick/publication/259465542_Experimental_De signs_Using_ANOVA/links/5e6bb05f92851c6ba7008 5db/Experimental-Designs-Using-ANOVA.pdf
  67. Ringle CM, Sarstedt M, Mitchell R, Gudergan SP. Partial least squares structural equation modeling in HRM research. The International Journal of Human Resource Management. 2020;31(12):1617-1643. doi:10.1080/09585192.2017.1416655
  68. Marcoulides GA. Modern Methods for Business Research. Psychology Press; 1998.
  69. El Ghazouli S, el Khalkhali I. Les principaux déterminants d’adoption du commerce électronique par le consommateur marocain.
  70. Hair J, Hollingsworth CL, Randolph AB, Chong AYL. An updated and expanded assessment of PLS-SEM in information systems research. IMDS. 2017;117(3):442- 458. doi:10.1108/IMDS-04-2016-0130
  71. Mourre ML. La modélisation par équations structurelles basée sur la méthode PLS : une approche intéressante pour la recherche en marketing. :24.
  72. Bagozzi RP, Yi Y. Specification, evaluation, and interpretation of structural equation models. J of the Acad Mark Sci. 2012;40(1):8-34. doi:10.1007/s11747- 011-0278-x
  73. Croutsche JJ. Étude des relations de causalité: Utilisation des modèles d’équations structurelles (approche méthodologique). La Revue des Sciences de Gestion: Direction et Gestion. 2002;(198):81.
  74. Iacobucci D. Structural equations modeling: Fit indices, sample size, and advanced topics. Journal of consumer psychology. 2010;20(1):90-98.
  75. Wetzels, Odekerken-Schröder, van Oppen. Using PLS Path Modeling for Assessing Hierarchical Construct Models: Guidelines and Empirical Illustration. MIS Quarterly. 2009;33(1):177. doi:10.2307/20650284
  76. Sunder S, Kim KH, Yorkston EA. What drives herding behavior in online ratings? The role of rater experience, product portfolio, and diverging opinions. Journal of Marketing. 2019;83(6):93-112.
  77. Sheehan B, Jin HS, Gottlieb U. Customer service chatbots: Anthropomorphism and adoption. Journal of Business Research. 2020;115:14-24.
  78. De Visser EJ, Monfort SS, McKendrick R, et al. Almost human: Anthropomorphism increases trust resilience in cognitive agents. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied. 2016;22(3):331.
  79. Balakrishnan J, Dwivedi YK. Conversational commerce: entering the next stage of AI-powered digital assistants. Ann Oper Res. Published online April 12, 2021. doi:10.1007/s10479-021-04049-5
  80. Sripalawat J, Thongmak M, Ngramyarn A. M-banking in metropolitan Bangkok and a comparison with other countries. Journal of computer information systems. 2011;51(3):67-76.
  81. Gursoy D, Chi OH, Lu L, Nunkoo R. Consumers acceptance of artificially intelligent (AI) device use in service delivery. International Journal of Information Management. 2019;49:157-169.
  82. Verma P, Sinha N. Integrating perceived economic wellbeing to technology acceptance model: The case of mobile based agricultural extension service. Technological forecasting and social change. 2018;126:207-216.
  83. Janani S, Wiles MA, Mishra S. Marketing Competence and Institutional Trust in Business. Journal of International Marketing. 2022;30(3):5-17.
  84. Talwar S, Talwar M, Kaur P, Dhir A. Consumers’ resistance to digital innovations: A systematic review and framework development. Australasian Marketing Journal (AMJ). 2020;28(4):286-299.
  85. Riffai M, Grant K, Edgar D. Big TAM in Oman: Exploring the promise of on-line banking, its adoption by customers and the challenges of banking in Oman. International journal of information management. 2012;32(3):239-250.
  86. Garg A. Investigating the Moderating Effects of Age and Gender on Customers’ Use of Tablet Menu in Casual Dining Restaurants. Journal of Quality Assurance in Hospitality & Tourism. 2022;23(6):1509- 1547. doi:10.1080/1528008X.2021.2002786
  87. Natarajan T, Balasubramanian SA, Kasilingam DL. Understanding the intention to use mobile shopping applications and its influence on price sensitivity. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services. 2017;37:8-22. doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2017.02.010
  88. Shannon J. Gender Differences or Gendered Differences: Understanding the Power of Language in Training and Research in Supervision. Int J Adv Counselling. 2019;41(4):598-608. doi:10.1007/s10447-019-09380-y
  89. Coeurderoy R, Guilmot N, Vas A. Explaining factors affecting technological change adoption: A survival analysis of an information system implementation. Management Decision. 2014;52(6):1082-1100.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>