Vol. 3 No. 1 (2024): International Journal of Automation and Digital Transformation
Articles

Navigating the Complexity of Construction Contracts and the value of Blockchain Technology: A Systems Dynamics Perspective - Review Paper

PDF
  • Ahmed Abdelghany

Published 2024-02-29

Keywords

  • Construction Contracts,
  • Systems Thinking,
  • Blockchain Technology,
  • Smart Contracts,
  • Contract Management,
  • Transparency in Construction,
  • Efficiency in Project Management,
  • Dispute Resolution,
  • Compliance Tracking,
  • Technological Integration
    • ...More
    Less

Copyright (c) 2024 International Journal of Automation and Digital Transformation

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

Navigating the Complexity of Construction Contracts and the value of Blockchain Technology: A Systems Dynamics Perspective - Review Paper. (2024). International Journal of Automation and Digital Transformation, 3(1), 44-64. https://doi.org/10.54878/ttj2p747

Abstract

This paper examines the integration of systems thinking and blockchain technology in construction contract management. It addresses the complexities inherent in construction contracts, which are often exacerbated by issues in transparency, efficiency, and stakeholder collaboration. Systems thinking is applied to understand the dynamic interactions within contracts, while blockchain technology is explored as a solution for enhancing contract management, focusing on its capabilities for improving transparency, streamlining execution, and facilitating dispute resolution. The paper critically analyzes the potential benefits and challenges of blockchain implementation in construction, including technological complexities, regulatory uncertainties, and industry adoption barriers. Through a synthesis of current literature and case studies, the paper highlights the transformative potential of combining systems thinking and blockchain in construction contracts, offering insights into future research directions and technological advancements needed for effective integration. This approach promises a more efficient, transparent, and collaborative future in construction contract management, aligning with the industry’s evolving needs in an era of rapid technological change.

PDF

References

  1. ’Abd El-Hamid, M. S., ’Farag, S. ., & ’Abdelalim, A. M. . (2023). Construction Contracts’ Pricing according to Contractual Provisions and Risk Allocation. International Journal of Civil and Structural Engineering Research, April.
  2. Abdelghany, A. H. (2021). The potential of adopting Blockchain Technology with BIM Implementations in the Construction Industry Ecosystem -A Review Paper The potential of adopting Blockchain Technology with BIM Implementations in the Construction Industry Ecosystem – A Review Pape. April. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.33181.18407
  3. Abdullah, N., Chin, O. T., & Nasir, N. A. (2023). Good Faith in Construction Contract: A Common Law Perspective. International Journal of Sustainable Construction Engineering and Technology, 14(2), 88–95. https://doi.org/10.30880/ijscet.2023.14.02.009
  4. Aherne, W. (n.d.). The NEC3 contract philosophy; collaborative and proactive. Retrieved December 4, 2021, from https://www.linesight.com/en-us/insights/thenec3-contract-philosophy-collaborative-and-proactive/
  5. Ameyaw, E. E., Edwards, D. J., Kumar, B., Thurairajah, N., Owusu-Manu, D.-G., & Oppong, G. D. (2023). Critical Factors Influencing Adoption of Blockchain-Enabled Smart Contracts in Construction Projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 149(3). https://doi.org/10.1061/jcemd4.coeng-12081
  6. Antoniou, F., & Tsioulpa, A. (2023). Assessing the Delay, Cost and Quality Risks of Claims on Construction Contract Performance. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202312.0716.v1
  7. Anuradha, I. G. N., Ambagala, K. K., Nanayakkara, S., & Perera, S. (2023). Adaptation of Blockchain and Smart Contracts To the Construction Industry of Developing Countries. World Construction Symposium, 1(July), 73–85. https://doi.org/10.31705/WCS.2023.7
  8. Bezpalov, V., Goncharenko, L., Fedyunin, D., Lochan, S., & Avtonomova, S. (2023). Developing a model of work duration under the influence of risk events in the implementation of life cycle contracts for large energy construction projects. Journal of Infrastructure, Policy and Development, 7(3). https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd.v7i3.1946
  9. Budayan, C., & Okudan, O. (2023). Assessment of Barriers to the Implementation of Smart Contracts in Construction Projects—Evidence from Turkey. Buildings, 13(8), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13082084
  10. Chaudhary, N., Mishra, A. K., & Aithal, P. S. (2023). Analysis of Price Adjustment Payments for RCC T-Beam and Pre-stressed Bridges Construction Contracts. International Journal of Case Studies in Business, IT, and Education, February, 141–163. https://doi.org/10.47992/ijcsbe.2581.6942.0250
  11. Chen, G., Liu, M., Li, H., Hsiang, S. M., & Jarvamard, A. (2023). Motivating Reliable Collaboration for Modular Construction: Shapley Value–Based Smart Contract. Journal of Management in Engineering, 39(6). https://doi.org/10.1061/jmenea.meeng-5428
  12. Chiponde, D. B., Mutale, L. P., Ziko, J. M., & Jalo, N. (2017). Assessing the feasibility of using building information modelling (BIM) to improve collaboration on public sector projects in the Zambian construction industry. WIT Transactions on the Built Environment, 169, 191–199. https://doi.org/10.2495/BIM170181
  13. Di Giuda, G. M., Pattini, G., Seghezzi, E., Schievano, M., & Paleari, F. (2020). The construction contract execution through the integration of blockchain technology. Research for Development, 27–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33570-0_3
  14. Evans, R. (2018). Worldwide Updates To International Standard Forms NEC4 And FIDIC 2017. https://www.mondaq.com/uk/governmentcontracts-procurement-ppp/672058/updates-tointernational-standard-forms-nec4-and-fidic-2017
  15. Glover, J. (2017a). NEC4 and FIDIC compared. Fenwick Elliott. https://www.fenwickelliott.com/researchinsight/annual-review/2017/nec4-fidic-compared
  16. Glover, J. (2017b). Some thoughts on how the 2017 FIDIC contract deals with time. Fenwick Elliott. https://www.fenwickelliott.com/research-insight/newsletters/international-quarterly/how-fidic-contract-deals-with-time
  17. Govoni, N. A. (2012). Exploratory Research. Dictionary of Marketing Communications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452229669.n1220
  18. HM TREASURY. (2013). Infrastructure procurement routemap technical note on application (Issue January). https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/ uploads/attachment_data/file/329056/PU1445_In frastructure_procurement_routemap_techincal_note_on_application.pdf
  19. Huzaimi Abd Jamil, A., & Syazli Fathi, M. (2019). Contractual issues for Building Information Modelling (BIM)-based construction projects: An exploratory case study. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 513(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/513/1/012035
  20. Imamova, D. (2023). THE CONCEPT OF AN INTERNATIONAL CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT. December. https://doi.org/10.51788/TSUL.ROLS
  21. Jain, A., & Patil, D. (2020). Evaluation of Risk Factors of Cost Plus Contract for Implementing in Indian Construction Projects. Available at SSRN 3644263, September.
  22. Kassem, M., & Ahmed, A. L. (2022). Digital transformation through Building Information Modelling: Spanning the macro-micro divide. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 184(August), 122006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.122006
  23. Knobel, P., & Naweed, A. (2023). How does the regulatory context influence systems thinking in work health and safety (WHS) inspectors? Safety Science, 166(July), 106237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2023.106237
  24. Kunkcu, H., Koc, K., Gurgun, A. P., & Dagou, H. H. (2023). Operational Barriers against the Use of Smart Contracts in Construction Projects. Teknik Dergi/Technical Journal of Turkish Chamber of Civil Engineers, 34(5), 81–106. https://doi.org/10.18400/tjce.1322972
  25. Latham, S. M. (1994). Constructing the team.
  26. Leungbootnak, N., Chaithongrat, T., & Aksorn, P. (2018). An exploratory factor analysis of government construction procurement problems. MATEC Web of Conferences, 192, 2057. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201819202057
  27. Lötzke, D., Heusser, P., & Büssing, A. (2015). A systematic literature review on the effectiveness of eurythmy therapy. Journal of Integrative Medicine, 13(4), 217–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2095-4964(15)60163-7
  28. More, J. (2017). The new NEC 4 – it is not revolting! | Fenwick Elliott. Fenwick Elliot. https://www.fenwickelliott.com/blog/contracts-documentation/nec4-not-revolting
  29. Moreira, J. I., & Vecellio Segate, R. (2021). The “It” Arbitrator: Why Do Corporations Not Act as Arbitrators? Journal of International Dispute Settlement, 12(4), 525–557. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnlids/idab022
  30. Nabavi, E., Daniell, K. A., & Najafi, H. (2017). Boundary matters: the potential of system dynamics to support sustainability? Journal of Cleaner Production, 140, 312–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.03.032
  31. Nalioğlu, V., Tokdemir, H., & Artan, D. (2023). Possible Impacts of Smart Contracts on Construction Claim Management. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, 350 LNCE(June), 1631– 1639. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-32511- 3_167
  32. Oesterreich, T. D., & Teuteberg, F. (2018). Looking at the big picture of IS investment appraisal through the lens of systems theory: A System Dynamics approach for understanding the economic impact of BIM. Computers in Industry, 99(January), 262–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2018.03.029
  33. Popovici, A., & Melnic, G. (2023). Legal and accounting aspects of construction contracts. Supremacy of Law, 2, 130–140. https://doi.org/10.52388/2345-1971.2022.e2.12
  34. Rashid, M. R. (2024). Lump Sum Contracts in Construction : Benefits , Challenges , and Risk Allocation Strategies. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202401.0691.v1
  35. Rasslan, N. D., & Nassar, A. H. (2017). Comparing Suitability of NEC and FIDIC Contracts in Managing Construction Project in Egypt. International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology, 6(6), 531–535.
  36. Rebs, T., Brandenburg, M., & Seuring, S. (2019). System dynamics modeling for sustainable supply chain management: A literature review and systems thinking approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 208, 1265–1280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.100
  37. Riddeck, L., Ceeney, R., & Rowan, V. (2013). The NEC3 Engineering and Construction Contract: A Comparative Analysis – Part 1 | Perspectives | Reed Smith LLP. Reed Smith Client Alert. https://www.reedsmith.com/en/perspectives/2013/04/the-nec3-engineering-and-construction-contract-a-c
  38. Santos, J. B., & Cabral, S. (2022). Public procurement capabilities as engines for collaboration and enhanced performance in complex projects. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 42(1), 32–58. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-02-2021-0098
  39. Stellmacher, D., Kaufhold, M., Meins-Becker, H. A., & Helmus, M. (2023). the Suitability of Existing Construction Contracts Forms for Bim Construction Projects. Proceedings of International Structural Engineering and Construction, 10(1), AAE-17-1-AAE-17-6. https://doi.org/10.14455/ISEC.2023.10(1).AAE-17
  40. Sudarshan Tiwari, Madhav Prasad Koirala, Santosh Kumar Shrestha, & Om Prakash Giri. (2023). The reliability of the standard deviation bid method for awarding construction contracts. Advances in Engineering and Technology: An International Journal, 3(1), 57–76. https://doi.org/10.3126/aet.v3i1.60724
  41. Sweeney, L. B., & Sterman, J. D. (2000). Bathtub dynamics: Initial results of a systems thinking inventory. System Dynamics Review, 16(4), 249– 286. https://doi.org/10.1002/sdr.198
  42. Tan, Y., Jiao, L., Shuai, C., & Shen, L. (2018). A system dynamics model for simulating urban sustainability performance: A China case study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 199, 1107–1115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.154
  43. Tougwa, F. N. (2015). Investigation of Problems or challenges faced by the Procurement and delivery of quality construction projects in Africa and Cameroon. Journal Research Gate, 2(May 2015), 1–17. https://www.academia.edu/13651172/
  44. Vilkonis, A. (2023). Rational Combination of Fidic Construction Contract Model and Contract Purchase Pricing. March. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/370266864
  45. Weerapperuma, U. S., Rathnasinghe, A. P., Jayasena, H. S., Wijewickrama, C. S., & Thurairajah, N. (2023). A knowledge framework for blockchain-enabled smart contract adoption in the construction industry. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, July. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-01-2023-0012
  46. Wefki, H., Salah, M., & Elsharkawi, H. M. (2023). Deciphering the Nexus: BlockchainSmart Contracts and Their Transformative Potential in the Construction Industry. Journal of Engineering Research, 7(5), 19–30. https://doi.org/10.21608/erjeng.2023.241892.1278
  47. Wulandary, K., Panuwatwanich, K., & Henry, M. (2023). Readiness and Potential Application of Smart Contracts in the Indonesian Construction Industry. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, 302 LNCE(March), 249–263. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-7331-4_21
  48. Yuana, R., Prasetio, E. A., Syarief, R., Arkeman, Y., & Suroso, A. I. (2021). System dynamic and simulation of business model innovation in digital companies: An open innovation approach. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 7(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc7040219
  49. Zhang, L., Yao, H., Fu, Y., & Chen, Y. (2023). Comparing Subjective and Objective Measurements of Contract Complexity in Influencing Construction Project Performance: Survey versus Machine Learning. Journal of Management in Engineering, 39(4). https://doi.org/10.1061/jmenea.meeng-5331
  50. Zhao, N., Ying, F. J., & Tookey, J. (2022). Knowledge visualisation for construction procurement decision-making: a process innovation. Management Decision, 60(4), 1039– 1055. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-01-2021-0051
  51. Право, Р. Г., Право, Г.-процесуальне, Будівництва, В. І., & Кулага, Е. В. (2022). Розділ 4. господарське право, господарськопроцесуальне право. 208–213