Metaphysical Nūr And Generation Alpha: Technology, Ontology, and the Crisis of Orientation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54878/70e44x68Keywords:
Nūr, Islamic metaphysics, Generation Alpha, AI ethics, educationAbstract
Purpose - This study examines the Islamic metaphysical concept of Nūr (light) as an ontological and epistemic framework for understanding the technological condition of Generation Alpha. The purpose is to clarify the distinction between technological illumination—characterized by visibility, access, and informational abundance—and orienting illumination, understood as intelligibility, guidance, and meaning. By doing so, the paper seeks to address the growing crisis of orientation affecting younger generations in digitally saturated environments. Methods - The research adopts a qualitative, theoretical, and interdisciplinary methodology. It combines hermeneutic analysis of Qurʾānic texts and classical Islamic philosophy with conceptual analysis drawn from contemporary philosophy of technology, media theory, pedagogy, and AI ethics. Institutional statistical data from international organizations are used descriptively to contextualize the analysis, without serving as primary empirical evidence. Results - The study demonstrates that contemporary digital technologies generate unprecedented levels of illumination in the form of constant visibility and exposure yet lack intrinsic orientational capacity. This form of technological illumination differs structurally from Nūr, which functions as a principle uniting manifestation, intelligibility, and guidance. As a result, digital environments tend to amplify information while weakening meaning, discernment, and interior integration, particularly in the formative experiences of Generation Alpha. Conclusions - The paper concludes that Nūr, employed as a non-confessional metaphysical heuristic, provides a robust ontological criterion for distinguishing between exposure and guidance, correctness and wisdom. This framework offers significant pedagogical and ethical implications for education, writing, and the use of artificial intelligence, emphasizing the need to reorient technological practices toward discernment, interiority, and meaningful human understanding.
References
Al-Ghazālī. (n.d.). Mishkāt al-Anwār [The niche of lights]. Various critical Arabic editions; English translations available.
Borgmann, A. (1984). Technology and the character of contemporary life: A philosophical inquiry. University of Chicago Press.
Chittick, W. C. (1989). The Sufi path of knowledge: Ibn al-ʿArabī’s metaphysics of imagination. State University of New York Press.
Coeckelbergh, M. (2020). AI ethics. MIT Press.
Crary, J. (2013). 24/7: Late capitalism and the ends of sleep. Verso.
Dreyfus, H. L. (1972). What computers can’t do: A critique of artificial reason. Harper & Row.
Ellul, J. (1964). The technological society. Knopf.
Feenberg, A. (1999). Questioning technology. Routledge.
Floridi, L. (2014). The ethics of information. Oxford University Press.
Floridi, L. (2019). The logic of information: A theory of philosophy as conceptual design. Oxford University Press.
Han, B.-C. (2017). In the swarm: Digital prospects (E. Butler, Trans.). MIT Press. (Original work published 2013)
Heidegger, M. (1977). The question concerning technology and other essays (W. Lovitt, Trans.). Harper & Row. (Original work published 1954)
Ibn ʿArabī. (n.d.). Al-Futūḥāt al-Makkiyya [The Meccan revelations]. Various critical Arabic editions.
Ibn Sīnā. (n.d.). Al-Ishārāt wa al-tanbīhāt [Remarks and admonitions]. Classical Arabic editions.
McLuhan, M. (1964). Understanding media: The extensions of man. McGraw-Hill.
Mullā Ṣadrā. (n.d.). Al-Asfār al-arbaʿa [The four intellectual journeys]. Classical Arabic editions.
Nasr, S. H. (1993). An introduction to Islamic cosmological doctrines. State University of New York Press.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2022). Education in the digital age. OECD Publishing.
Pew Research Center. (2023). Teens, technology, and mental health. Pew Research Center.
Postman, N. (1992). Technopoly: The surrender of culture to technology. Knopf.
Searle, J. R. (1980). Minds, brains, and programs. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3(3), 417–457. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00005756
Twenge, J. M. (2017). iGen: Why today’s superconnected kids are growing up less rebellious, more tolerant, less happy—and completely unprepared for adulthood. Atria Books. UNESCO. (2021). Reimagining our futures together: A new social contract for education. UNESCO Publishing.
UNICEF. (2021). Children in a digital world. UNICEF.
World Health Organization. (2022). Adolescent mental health. World Health Organization.