Comparative Analysis of Jung’s Anima–Animus and the Estrophrodite–Androphrodite Archetypes

Abstract

This paper introduces the Estrophrodite–Androphrodite archetypal model, expanding Jung’s anima–animus theory. Unlike Jung’s gender-specific constructs, these archetypes represent universal feminine (Estrophrodite) and masculine (Androphrodite) principles present in all individuals. Drawing from cross-cultural mythology, theology, and depth psychology, the article situates the model historically and conceptually, comparing it with Freudian, Adlerian, and Jungian frameworks. Using FIRO-B assessments of 58 individuals, patterns of archetypal integration and imbalance are illustrated, highlighting implications for identity, creativity, and relational competence. The Estrophrodite–Androphrodite framework provides a culturally inclusive, spiritually grounded, and psychologically flexible approach for contemporary practice.