Bridging the Assistive Technology Divide: Access, Barriers, and Pathways to Equity for Persons with Disabilities in Low- and Middle-Income Countries
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54878/y95ry408Keywords:
assistive technology, disability, low- and middle-income countries, access, health equity, universal health coverage, GATEAbstract
Assistive technology, from wheelchairs and hearing aids to spectacles and communication devices, is a precondition for the participation, health, education, and livelihood of people with disabilities, yet its distribution is among the most unequal in global health. The WHO and UNICEF estimate that more than 2.5 billion people need one or more assistive products today and that this figure will approach 3.5 billion by mid-century, while access in some low-income settings reaches only a small fraction of need. This narrative review examines why the gap is so wide in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) and what can close it. Organising the evidence around the World Health Organization's GATE building blocks of people, policy, products, provision, and personnel, we identify a consistent set of barriers: low demand rooted in limited awareness; products that are unaffordable or poorly suited to local environments; fragmented or absent provision systems weakly linked to health services; a scarce and under-trained workforce; and financing and social-protection systems that leave disability-related costs to fall on households already near poverty. We then synthesise the pathways that evidence and international consensus support: national assistive-technology policy, affordable and appropriately designed products, workforce capacity-building integrated with community-based rehabilitation, financing through universal health coverage and social protection, and the careful use of digital and tele-delivery. We argue that the central obstacle is no longer conceptual but a matter of political will and system-building, and that regional leadership, including Gulf models that frame disability through participation and rights, offers a template others can adapt. The review is limited by uneven and often descriptive evidence, particularly from the lowest-income and most fragile settings.References
Adugna, M. B., Nabbouh, F., Shehata, S., & Butler, L. (2020). Barriers and facilitators to healthcare access for children with disabilities in low and middle income sub-Saharan African countries: A scoping review. BMC Health Services Research, 20, 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-4822-6
Alhumaidan, A. A., & Habbal, F. M. (2025). The effect of learning technologies on behavioral development among People of Determination in the UAE. International Journal of Rehabilitation & Disability Studies, 1(1), 4–13. https://doi.org/10.54878/yzgtf267
Boot, F. H., Owuor, J., Dinsmore, J., & MacLachlan, M. (2018). Access to assistive technology for people with intellectual disabilities: A systematic review to identify barriers and facilitators. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 62(10), 900–921. https://doi.org/10.1111/jir.12532
Borg, J., Layton, N., Zhang, W., & Steel, E. J. (2021). Introduction to the companion papers to the global report on assistive technology. Assistive Technology, 33(sup1), 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2021.2005364
Cote, A. (2021). Social protection and access to assistive technology in low- and middle-income countries. Assistive Technology, 33(sup1), 102–108. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2021.1994052
Cyuzuzo, C., Dukuzimana, M. J., Muhire, C., Ames, M. S., & Ngwakongnwi, E. (2024). Challenges to rehabilitation services in Sub-Saharan Africa from a user, health system, and service provider perspective: Scoping review. JMIR Human Factors, 11, e46220. https://doi.org/10.2196/46220
MacLachlan, M., Banes, D., Bell, D., Borg, J., Donnelly, B., Fembek, M., … Hooks, H. (2018). Assistive technology policy: A position paper from the first global research, innovation, and education on assistive technology (GREAT) summit. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 13(5), 454–466. https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2018.1468496
McPherson, B. (2014). Hearing assistive technologies in developing countries: Background, achievements and challenges. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 9(5), 360–364. https://doi.org/10.3109/17483107.2014.907365
Naghavi, A., Faramarzi, S., Abbasi, A., & Badakhshiyan, S.-S. (2022). COVID-19 and challenges of assistive technology use in Iran. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 17(3), 268–274. https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2022.2032414
Puli, L., Layton, N., Bell, D., & Shahriar, A. Z. (2024). Financial inclusion for people with disability: A scoping review. Global Health Action, 17(1), 2342634. https://doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2024.2342634
Senjam, S. S., Foster, A., & Bascaran, C. (2020). Barriers to using assistive technology among students with visual disability in schools for the blind in Delhi, India. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 16(7), 802–806. https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2020.1738566
Shaikh, S., Sayed, Y., Sahakyan, E., Muradyan, T., & Rubinger, J. (2025). A case study on the “We Read” (نقرأ) Literacy Lab: Using assistive technology as a transitional tool for inclusive education. International Journal of Rehabilitation & Disability Studies, 1(1), 14–26. https://doi.org/10.54878/3x3yhv70
Tangcharoensathien, V., Witthayapipopsakul, W., Viriyathorn, S., & Patcharanarumol, W. (2018). Improving access to assistive technologies: Challenges and solutions in low- and middle-income countries. WHO South-East Asia Journal of Public Health, 7(2), 84–89. https://doi.org/10.4103/2224-3151.239419
Toro-Hernández, M. L., Kankipati, P., Goldberg, M., Contepomi, S., Tsukimoto, D. R., & Bray, N. (2019). Appropriate assistive technology for developing countries. Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinics of North America, 30(4), 847–865. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmr.2019.07.008
Visagie, S., Eide, A. H., Mannan, H., Schneider, M., Swartz, L., Mji, G., … MacLachlan, M. (2017). A description of assistive technology sources, services and outcomes of use in a number of African settings. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 12(7), 705–712. https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2016.1244293
World Health Organization & UNICEF. (2022). Global report on assistive technology. Geneva: World Health Organization and the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF).
Zhang, W., Eide, A. H., Pryor, W., Khasnabis, C., & Borg, J. (2021). Measuring self-reported access to assistive technology using the WHO rapid assistive technology assessment (rATA) questionnaire: Protocol for a multi-country study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(24), 13336. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182413336
Yilma, T. M., Mekonone, S. T., Alene, B. M., Kibret, A. K., Alemayehu, Z., Addis, B. M., … Davies, T. C. (2023). Assistive technology use and its associated factors among university students with disabilities: A case study in a developing country — mixed study design. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 19(4), 1748–1757. https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2023.2233981
