Vol. 2 No. 1 (2023): Emirati Journal of Business, Economics, & Social Studies
Articles

The Reliability of Corporate Zero-Default Debt

PDF
  • Hatem Elshreif
Hatem Elshreif
Cardiff School of Business
Emirati Journal of Business, Economics, & Social Studies

Published 2023-10-04

Keywords

  • Corporate Debt Safe Buffer,
  • Corporate Bankruptcy

How to Cite

The Reliability of Corporate Zero-Default Debt. (2023). Emirati Journal of Business, Economics, & Social Studies, 2(1), 4-16. https://doi.org/10.54878/8mwj2c94

Abstract

Although corporate bankruptcy has been examined in terms of measurement and modeling, a question remains standing still: Is it worthy enough to predict the bankruptcy or will it be better to develop a tool to prevent it from the beginning?

Corporate bankruptcy techniques, models and theories focus on predicting the bankruptcy only rather than preventing bankruptcy which helps corporate managers take the right borrowing decision. The researcher believes that Corporate Debt Safe Buffer is a valid model in this respect.

This thesis tests a bankruptcy prevention model (Eldomiaty, et al., 2014) on the non-financial firms listed in DJIA30 and NASDAQ100 over the period 1999-2016. The results provide a validation for this model with Trade off, Pecking Order and Free Cash Flow theories of capital structure as the results are quite significant and can be used for determining a debt ratio safe buffer. 

The researcher uses the following statistical methods to test the new model Lagrange Multiplier Test, Cointegration Using Unit Root Test, Linearity versus Nonlinearity Test, Hausman Test. The results prove that: (a) firms tend to adapt a positive debt ratio safe buffer, (b) there is no significant difference between debt ratio safe buffer and the observed debt ratio. 

The overall results show that the predication of bankruptcy is a helpful tool for credit rating agencies when evaluating corporate creditworthiness, although the model help avoiding bankruptcy. 

PDF

References

  1. Ahmed AHMADPOUR HASGARI (2013), A review of Bankruptcy and its prediction, International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, Vol.3 No 4, pp.274-277
  2. Akhtar, S. and Oliver, B. 2009. Determinants of Capital Structure for Japanese Multinational and Domestic Corporations. International Review of Finance, 9(1–2):1–26.
  3. Ali, A., A. Klein, and J. Rosenfeld. 1992. Analysts’ use of information about permanent and transitory earnings components in forecasting annual EPS. The Accounting Review 67 (1): 183-198.
  4. Altman, E. (1968). Financial Ratios, Discriminant Analysis and the Prediction of Corporate Bankruptcy. Journal of Finance. 23 (4), 581-609
  5. Altman, Edward I., Andrea Resti and Andrea Sironi, 2006, Default Recovery Rates: A Review of the Literature and Recent Empirical Evidence. Journal of Finance Literature, 1 (winter): 21-45.
  6. Anderson, T. W., and Darling, D. A. 1952. Asymptotic theory of certain ‘goodness-of-fit’criteria based on stochastic processes. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 23(2): 193-212. Anderson, T. W., and Darling, D. A. 1954. A test of goodness-of-fit. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 49 (268): 765-769.
  7. Antoniou, A., Guney, Y., and Paudyal, K. 2008. The Determinants of Capital Structure: Capital MarketOriented versus Bank-Oriented Institutions. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 43(1): 59-92.
  8. Araten, M., M. Jacobs and P. Varshny, 2004. Measuring LGD on Commercial Loans. The RMA Journal, May.
  9. Asarnow, E, and D. Edwards, 1995. Measuring Loss on Defaulted Bank Loans: a 24 year Study. Journal of Commercial Bank Lending, 77(7): 11-23.
  10. Ayaydin, O. A., Florackis, C. and Ozkan, A. 2014. Financial flexibility, corporate investment and performance: evidence from financial crises. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 42(2): 211-250.
  11. Bakshi, G., D. Madan, F. Zhang, 2001. Understanding the Role of Recovery in Default Risk Models: Empirical Comparisons and Implied Recovery Rates. Finance and Economics Discussion Series, 2001-37, Federal Reserve Board of Governors, Washington D.C. Black, F. and Scholes M. 1973. The pricing of options and corporate liabilities. Journal of Political Economy, 81(3): 637-654.
  12. Booth, L., Aivazian, V., Demirguc-Kunt, A., and Maksimovic, V. 2001. Capital Structure in Developing Countries. The Journal of Finance, 56(1): 87-130.
  13. Carey, M. and Gordy, M. 2003. Systematic Risk in Recoveries on Defaulted Debt, mimeo, Federal Reserve Board, Washington.
  14. Castanias, R. 1983. Bankruptcy Risk and Optimal Capital Structure. The Journal of Finance,38(5): 1617-1635.
  15. Chabane, A., Jean-Paul, L. and Salomon, J. 2004. Double Impact: Credit Risk Assessment and Collateral Value. Review of Finance, 25(1): 157-78.
  16. Chang, S. C., Chen, S. S., Hsing, A. and Huang, C. W. 2007. Investment opportunities, free cash flow, and stock valuation effects of secured debt offerings. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 28(2): 123-145.
  17. Chang, C. and Yu, X. 2010. Informational Efficiency and Liquidity Premium as the Determinants of Capital Structure. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 45(2): 401–440.
  18. Dreyer, J. 2010. Capital structure: Profitability, earnings volatility and the probability of financial distress. Unpublished MSc, Gordon Institute of Business Science, University of Pretoria.
  19. Dullman, K. and Trapp, M. 2004. Systematic Risk in Recovery Rates – An Empirical Analysis of U.S. Corporate Credit Exposures. EFWA Basel Paper.
  20. Eales, R. and Bosworth, E. 1998. Severity of Loss in the Event of Default in Small Business and Large Consumer Loans. The Journal of Lending and Credit Risk management, May, 58-65.
  21. Rates on North American Syndicated Bank Loans, 1989-2003, Moody’s Investors Service.
  22. Eldomiaty, T. and Ismail, M. 2009. Modeling capital structure decisions in a transition market: empirical analysis of firms in Egypt. Review of Quantitative Finance & Accounting, 32(3): 211-233.
  23. Eldomiaty, T. Mostafa, W. and Attia,O. 2014.Empiricism of corporate debt safe buffer. Misr International University Faculty of Business Administration and International Trade.
  24. Fattouh, B., Harris, L., and Scaramozzino, P. 2008. Non-linearity in the determinants of capital structure: evidence from UK firms. Empirical Economics, 34(3):417–438.
  25. Frankel, R. and Lee, Charles M. C. 1998. Accounting Valuation, Market Expectation, and Cross- Sectional Stock Returns, Journal of Accounting and Economics 25(3): 283-319.
  26. Fridson, Martin S., Garman, Christopher M. and Okashima, K. 2000. Recovery Rates: The Search for Meaning, Merrill Lynch & Co., High Yield Strategy. Frye, J. 2000. Depressing Recoveries, Risk, November.
  27. Gaud, P., Jani, E., Hoesli, M. and Bender, A. 2005. The Capital Structure of Swiss Companies:an Empirical Analysis using Dynamic Panel Data. European Financial Management,11(1): 51–69.
  28. Geske, R. 1977. The Valuation of Corporate Liabilities as Compound Options, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 12(4): 541-552.
  29. George, T. J., Kaul, G. and Nimalendran, M. 1991. Estimation of the Bid-Ask Spread and its Components: A New Approach. Review of Financial Studies 4(4): 623-656.
  30. Glosten, L. R. and Harris, L. E. 1988. Estimating the Components of the Bid/Ask Spread. Journal of Financial Economic, 21(1): 123-42.
  31. Gordon, M.J. (1971). Towards Theory of Financial Distress. The Journal of Finance, pp. 74-56.
  32. Hertz, J., Krough, A., and Palmer, R., (1991), Introduction to the Theory of Neural Computing, NY: Addsion Wesley.
  33. Assessing the Probability of Bankruptcy. Working Paper, Kellogg School of Management, Northwestern University.
  34. Hu, Yen-Ting, and Perraudin, W. 2002. The Dependence of Recovery Rates and Defaults. BirkBeck College, mimeo, February and CEPR Working Paper.
  35. Huang, R. D. and Stoll, H. R. 1997. The Components of the Bid-Ask Spread: A General Approach, Review of Financial Studies 10(4): 995-1034.
  36. Hol, S., Sjur Westgaard and Nico van der Wijst. 2002. Capital structure and the prediction of bankruptcy, Working Paper, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Department of Industrial Economics and Technology Management.
  37. Jaggi, B. and Gul, F. A. 1999. An Analysis of Joint Effects of Investment Opportunity Set, Free Cash Flows and Size on Corporate Debt Policy. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 12(4): 371-381.
  38. Jarrow, Robert A., 2001. Default Parameter Estimation Using Market Prices. Financial Analysts Journal, 57(5): 75-92.
  39. Jokivuolle, E. and Peura, S. 2003. Incorporating collateral value uncertainty in loss given default estimates and loan-to-value rations. European Financial Management, 9(3): 299-314.
  40. Jun, A. G. and Jen, F. C. 2003. Trade-off model of debt maturity structure. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 20(1): 5-34.
  41. Keisman, D. and Marshella. T. 2009. Recoveries on Defaulted Debt in an Era of Black Swans. Moody’s Global Corporate Finance, Moody’s Investments Service, June.
  42. Kahya, E. and Theodossiou, P. 1999. Predicting corporate financial distress: A time-series CUSUM methodology. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 13(4): 323-345.
  43. Kane, G. D. and Richardson, F. M. 2002. The relationship between changes in fixed plant investment and the likelihood of emergence from corporate financial distress. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 18(3): 259-272.
  44. Hillegeist, Stephen A. and Keating, Elizabeth K. 2003. discount rate for default risk and bankruptcy costs. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Forthcoming (http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11156-013-0356-x).
  45. Lachmann, Ludwig M. 1978. Capital and Its Structure. Institute for Humane Studies, Sheed Andrews and McMeel, INC, Kansas City.
  46. Lennox, C. 1999. Identifying Failing Companies: A Reevaluation of the Logit, Probit and DA Approaches. Journal of Economics and Business, 51(4): 347–364.
  47. Lev, B. (1973), ‘‘Decomposition measures for financial analysis’’, Financial Management, Spring, pp. 56-63.
  48. Lin, J., Sanger, G. and Booth, G. G. 1995. Trade Size and Components of the Bid-Ask Spread, Review of Financial Studies 8(4): 1153-1183.
  49. Madhavan, A., Richardson, M. and Roomans, M. 1997. Why Do Security Prices Change? A Transaction-Level Analysis of NYSE Stocks. Review of Financial Studies 10(4): 1035-1064.
  50. Madan, D., and Unal, H. 1998. Pricing the Risks of Default. Review of Derivatives Research, 2(2-3): 121-160.
  51. Merton, Robert C. 1974. On the Pricing of Corporate Debt: The Risk Structure of Interest Rates. Journal of Finance, 29(2): 449-471
  52. Myers, S. C. 1977. Determinants of corporate borrowing. Journal of Financial Economics, 5(2):147-175.
  53. Myers, S. C. 1984. The capital structure puzzle. Journal of Finance, 39(3): 574-592.
  54. Myers, S. C. 2001. Capital Structure. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15(2): 81-102.
  55. Neto de Carvalho and Jean Dermine, 2003, “Bank loan losses-given-default – empirical evidence, “Working Paper, INSEAD.
  56. Koziol, C. 2013. A simple correction of the WACC adjustment to long-run target: evidence from Canadian firms. Applied Economics Letters, 17(10): 983–990.
  57. Noulas, A. and Genimakis, G. 2011. The determinants of capital structure choice: evidence from Greek listed companies. Applied Financial Economics, 21(6): 379–387.
  58. Ojah, K. and Manrique, J. 2005. Determinants of corporate debt structure in a privately dominated debt market: a study of the Spanish capital market. Applied Financial Economics, 15(7): 455–468.
  59. Ozkan A. 2001. Determinants of capital structure and adjustment to long-run target: Evidence from UK company panel data. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 28(1-2): 175-198.
  60. Panno, A. 2003. An empirical investigation on the determinants of capital structure: the UK and Italian experience. Applied Financial Economics, 13(2): 97-112. Pykhtin, M. 2003. Unexpected recovery risk. Risk, 16, 74-78.
  61. Pongsatat, S., Ramage, J., & Lawrence, H. (2004). Bankruptcy prediction for large and small firms in Asia: a comparison of Ohlson and Altman. Journal of Accounting and Croporate Governance, 1(2), 1-13.
  62. Schuermann, Til, 2004. What Do We Know About Loss Given Default?, in D. Shimko (ed.), Credit Risk Models and Management, 2nd Edition, London, UK, Risk Books, 2006.
  63. Saita, L., 2006. The Puzzling Price of Corporate Default Risk, Stanford University, working paper.
  64. Shumway, T. 2001. Forecasting Bankruptcy More Accurately: A Simple Hazard Model, Journal of Business.74(1): 101-124.
  65. Somerville, R. A. and Taffler, R. J. 1994. The predictability of debt-servicing difficulties among less developed countries. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 4(4): 339-356.
  66. Thomas, S., 2003. Firm Diversification and Asymmetric Information: Evidence from Analysts’ Forecasts and Earnings Announcements. Journal of Financial Economics, 64(3): 373– 396.
  67. NuEnmkoiora, tPe. sKuSmcahroalnadr Boateng, A. 2010. The empirical determinants of target capital structure and Turetsky, Howard F. and McEwen, Ruth A. 2001. An empirical investigation of firm longevity: A model of the ex ante predictors of financial distress. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 16(4): 323-343.
  68. Tsai, S. C. 2005. Dynamic Models of Investment Distortions. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 25(4): 357-381.
  69. Van der Waerden, B. L. 1927. Beweis einer Baudetschen Vermutung, Nieuw Archief voor Wiskunde 15:, 212–216
  70. Van der Waerden, B. L. (1930). Moderne Algebra, volume 1. Julius Springer, Berlin, 1st edition. Van der Waerden, B. L. (1931). Moderne Algebra, volume 2. Julius Springer, Berlin, 1st edition.
  71. White, R. W. and Turnbull, S. M. 1974. The probability of bankruptcy for American industrial firms, Working Paper IFA-4-74, London Graduate School of Business Studies, London.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 > >>