مجلد 1 عدد 1 (2024): International Journal of Civilizations Studies & Tolerance Sciences
Articles

The Path to Tolerance begins with Eliminating Certitude

منشور 2024-05-14

الكلمات المفتاحية

  • reasoning,
  • limitations,
  • illusions,
  • consequences,
  • change

كيفية الاقتباس

The Path to Tolerance begins with Eliminating Certitude. (2024). International Journal of Civilizations Studies & Tolerance Sciences, 1(1), 66-75. https://doi.org/10.54878/mcav6y61

الملخص

The nub of this essay is that all our certitudes are illusory. But first, let me explain certitude, an uncommon word. It means holding absolute certainty about a notion, which, though one may believe that conviction to be the result of an intellectual process, is actually a feeling generated by our subjectivities – our formative and environmental circumstances – consistent with and reinforced by them. For instance, if we are financially secure, we may believe utterly that stealing is wrong, a moral consistent with the preservation of our wealth and comfort; whereas those who are starving may be less convinced. In short, certitude is a rigid sense that no other view is arguable. Certainty is also a firm conviction about an issue, but may be reached after logical reasoning, without any involvement of emotion. For example, once we accept the premises that All men are mortal and Charles is a man, we conclude with certainty that Charles is mortal; but we probably aren’t emotionally invested in that result. The availability of certainty in any enquiry depends much on the subject-matter and the methodology employed. Closed systems, like law and engineering, where accepted definitions and principles abound and deductive logic can be readily applied, offer a degree of certainty of conclusion on issues within the field. But with open topics, such as ethics, human rights, social behavior, politics and culture, both certainty and certitude about conclusions are unavailable. (The one exception is when those conclusions are dictated by religious belief, a situation which stands outside this discussion.) To say that certainty is unavailable is not to suggest that we should not hold firm opinions; merely that we should recognise that others may have contrary views for reasons no less arguable than our own. Why is certainty not achievable in respect of open topics? Because subjectivity enters the reasoning process, because language is ambiguous, especially when we address concepts themselves created by language, because truth is an abstract concept, and because of the limitations of the “tools”, such as logic, which we use for reasoning. If we rid ourselves of unjustified certitudes and certainties, what might follow?

المراجع

  1. Kahneman, Daniel. Thinking, Fast and Slow, at p58. (Penguin Group, Australia, 2012).
  2. Eliza Lee, Chinese University of Hong Kong. Human Rights and Chinese Values, ed Michael Davis, at p78. (Oxford University Press, 1995).
  3. Mariano Sigman, physician specialising in the cognitive neuroscience of learning and decision-making. The Secret Life of the Mind, at pp 37 and 45. (William Collins, 2017).
  4. Trotter, Wilfred. “Herd Instinct and its bearing on the psychology of Civilised Man”, (1908) Sociological Review 1 (3), 227-48.
  5. Bond, Michael Shaw. The Power of Others: Peer Pressure, Groupthink, and How the People Around Us Shape Everything We Do, Ch. 3, (One World Publications, 2014).
  6. Ludwig von Mises. Human Action; A Treatise in Economics at Part Two, Ch. IX (Yale University Press, 1949).
  7. Hume David; The Essential Philosophical Works, Treatise of Human Nature, Book 1, Part 1, Section 1. (Wordsworth Edition, 2011).
  8. Russell, Bertrand. History of Western Philosophy, at pp788, 789,(George Allen & Unwin, 1961).
  9. Bennet, Hayley and G A Broe, “The neurology of judicial decision-making: Indigenous Australians, native title and the Australian High Court” (2009) 20 Public Law Review112.
  10. Thinking, Fast and Slow, p51.
  11. Mabo v Queensland (No 2) (1992) 175 Commonwealth Law Reports (CLR)..
  12. Kirby, Michael. “Judging in a Changing World” (1998) Quadrant 12
  13. James C Raymond, Professor Emeritus, University of Alabama, where he was Director of Freshman English (1973-2001). President of the International Institute for Legal Writing and Reasoning. I have heard him speak many times.
  14. Pinker, Steven. The Sense of Style: The Thinking Person’s guide to writing in The 21st Century (Penguin Books, 2014).
  15. Russell, History of Western Philosophy, p785.
  16. Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Philosophical Investigations, Blackwell edn.
  17. Carnap, Rudolf. The Elimination of Metaphysics through Logical Analysis of Language (1931).
  18. Derrida, Jacques. Of Grammatology, Voice and Phenomenon, Writing and Difference (1967).
  19. Magee, Bryan. Confessions of a Philosopher: A Journey Through Western Philosophy, p112 (Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1997).
  20. Magee, Confessions of a Philosopher p64.
  21. Hobbes, Thomas. Leviathan, cited by Russell at pp533,534, History of Western Philosophy.
  22. See Thomas Kuhn (1922-1996), American physicist and philosopher of science, especially The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1962), (University of Chicago Press,1996)
  23. Logic – Sources: Minto, William, Logic, Inductive and Deductive (1893: ebook 2010 available at Project Gutenberg: www.gutenberg.org/files/31796/31796-h/31796-h.htm) Lee, Sui-Fan, Logic: A Complete Introduction (Hodder & Stoughton, 2017), Assistant Professor, Hong Kong Baptist University. A H Basson B.A. and D J O’Connor M.A., Ph.D., Introduction to Symbolic Logic, University Tutorial Press, 1953. Hacking, Ian. An Introduction to Probability and Inductive Logic (Cambridge University Press, 2001)
  24. Hugo Mercier, Reason and argumentation, Ch 22, The Routledge International Handbook of Thinking and Reasoning Ball, “The Handbook”. Linden J and Valerie A Thompson (eds). (Taylor & Francis, 2017).
  25. Kahneman, Thinking, Fast and Slow, pp8/9, Ch. 10-21.
  26. Koslowski, Barbara. Ch. 20, “The Handbook”.
  27. Schraagen, Jan Marten, Ch. 27, “The Hardbook”.
  28. Feeney Aidan, Ch. 10, “The Handbook” Ch ;
  29. Ackerman and Thompson, Valerie A Ch. 1, “The Handbook”
  30. Gigerenzer, Gerd, Reasoning the fast and frugal way: models of bounded rationality. (1996) Psychological Review 102, 684-704
  31. Simon, Herbert A., Administrative Behavior, (Palgrave Macmillan, 1947).
  32. Kahneman, Thinking, Fast and Slow, p385.
  33. Goel, Vinod and Waechter, Randall, Ch. 13, Inductive and Deductive Reasoning, “The Handbook”, at p243.
  34. Magee, Confessions of a Philosopher, at p126.
  35. Russell, History of Western Philosophy, at p14.
  36. McRaney, David. How Minds Change, p263 (Oneworld Publications, 2022)