Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

A Comparative Analysis of Thin-Walled Sections Using Finite Element Modelling

Emirati Journal of Civil Engineering and Applications

Articles

Vol. 2 No. 2 (2024): Emirati Journal of Civil Engineering and Applications

A Comparative Analysis of Thin-Walled Sections Using Finite Element Modelling

  • Fayiz Amin
  • Yasir Zaman
  • Abdul Wahid Anwar
  • Muhammad Asif
  • Khan Abdul Majid
  • Niazi Ehsanullah
  • Hafiz Ahmed Waqas
Submitted
August 7, 2024
Published
2024-08-07

Abstract

Thin-walled channel sections, such as Folded Sections, C-Sections, and Z-Sections, are extensively used in structural applications, particularly in civil engineering. This research investigates the behavior of cold-formed steel sections, including folded flanges, C-sections, and Z-sections, with respect to their ultimate load-carrying capacities. A numerical model will be developed using the finite element method in Abaqus software to simulate the behavior of these sections under axial compressive loading, covering both the elastic and plastic ranges. Comparative analysis of the folded sections, C-sections, and Z-sections is conducted. Z-section stands out with its significantly higher ultimate load capacity compared to the folded and C-sections. This can be attributed to its Z-shaped design. The objective of this study is to establish more robust design guidelines for the safe and efficient use of these sections in building structures. The findings will contribute to enhancing the reliability and economy of design practices for these structural elements.

References

  1. N. S. Ha and G. Lu, “Thin-walled corrugated structures: A review of crashworthiness designs and energy absorption characteristics,” Thin-Walled Structures, vol. 157, p. 106995, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.1016/J.TWS.2020.106995.
  2. O. Bourihane, A. Ed-Dinari, B. Braikat, M. Jamal, F. Mohri, and N. Damil, “Stability analysis of thin-walled beams with open section subject to arbitrary loads,” Thin-Walled Structures, vol. 105, pp. 156–171, Aug. 2016, doi: 10.1016/J.TWS.2016.04.008.
  3. D. C. Han and S. H. Park, “Collapse behavior of square thin-walled columns subjected to oblique loads,” Thin-Walled Structures, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 167–184, Nov. 1999, doi: 10.1016/S0263-8231(99)00022-1.
  4. Dica. - and G. Gabbianelli Advisor Armando Gobetti Revisor Profssa Lucia Faravelli, “Numerical model for framed structures with thin-walled cross-section members,” Dec. 2017, Accessed: Jul. 09, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://iris.unipv.it/handle/11571/1203323
  5. M. W. Hilburger, “Buckling of Thin-Walled Circular Cylinders.” 2020.
  6. Q. Al-Kaseasbeh and I. H. P. Mamaghani, “Buckling Strength and Ductility Evaluation of Thin-Walled Steel Tubular Columns with Uniform and Graded Thickness under Cyclic Loading,” Journal of Bridge Engineering, vol. 24, no. 1, p. 04018105, Jan. 2018, doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001324.
  7. T. T. Nguyen, P. T. Thang, and J. Lee, “Lateral buckling analysis of thin-walled functionally graded open-section beams,” Compos Struct, vol. 160, pp. 952–963, Jan. 2017, doi: 10.1016/J.COMPSTRUCT.2016.10.017.
  8. J. P. Papangelis and G. J. Hancock, “Computer analysis of thin-walled structural members,” Comput Struct, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 157–176, Jul. 1995, doi: 10.1016/0045-7949(94)00545-E.
  9. C. H. Pham and G. J. Hancock, “Shear buckling of thin-walled channel sections,” J Constr Steel Res, vol. 65, no. 3, pp. 578–585, Mar. 2009, doi: 10.1016/J.JCSR.2008.05.015.
  10. T. A. Stone and R. A. LaBoube, “Behavior of cold-formed steel built-up I-sections,” Thin-Walled Structures, vol. 43, no. 12, pp. 1805–1817, Dec. 2005, doi: 10.1016/J.TWS.2005.09.001.
  11. Y. B. Sudhirsastry, Y. Krishna, and P. R. Budarapu, “Parametric studies on buckling of thin-walled channel beams,” Comput Mater Sci, vol. 96, no. PB, pp. 416–424, Jan. 2015, doi: 10.1016/J.COMMATSCI.2014.07.058.
  12. C. H. Pham, “Shear buckling of plates and thin-walled channel sections with holes,” J Constr Steel Res, vol. 128, pp. 800–811, Jan. 2017, doi: 10.1016/J.JCSR.2016.10.013.
  13. K. J. R. Rasmussen and G. J. Hancock, “Nonlinear analyses of thin-walled channel section columns,” Thin-Walled Structures, vol. 13, no. 1–2, pp. 145–176, Jan. 1992, doi: 10.1016/0263-8231(92)90006-I.
  14. M. Kotełko, “Load-capacity estimation and collapse analysis of thin-walled beams and columns—recent advances,” Thin-Walled Structures, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 153–175, Feb. 2004, doi: 10.1016/S0263-8231(03)00055-7.
  15. R. Q. Bridge and M. D. O’Shea, “Behaviour of thin-walled steel box sections with or without internal restraint,” J Constr Steel Res, vol. 47, no. 1–2, pp. 73–91, Aug. 1998, doi: 10.1016/S0143-974X (98)80103-X.
  16. R. F. Vieira, F. B. Virtuoso, and E. B. R. Pereira, “A higher order model for thin-walled structures with deformable cross-sections,” Int J Solids Struct, vol. 51, no. 3–4, pp. 575–598, Feb. 2014, doi: 10.1016/J.IJSOLSTR.2013.10.023.
  17. N. Silvestre and D. Camotim, “On the mechanics of distortion in thin-walled open sections,” Thin-Walled Structures, vol. 48, no. 7, pp. 469–481, Jul. 2010, doi: 10.1016/J.TWS.2010.02.001.
  18. S. Al-Mosawi and M. P. Saka, “Optimum shape design of cold-formed thin-walled steel sections,” Advances in Engineering Software, vol. 31, no. 11, pp. 851–862, Nov. 2000, doi: 10.1016/S0965-9978(00)00047-8.
  19. H. R. Ronagh, M. A. Bradford, and M. M. Attard, “Nonlinear analysis of thin-walled members of variable cross-section. Part I: Theory,” Comput Struct, vol. 77, no. 3, pp. 285–299, Jun. 2000, doi: 10.1016/S0045-7949(99)00223-0.
  20. Z. Kowal and A. Szychowski, “Experimental determination of critical loads in thin-walled bars with Z-section subjected to warping torsion,” Thin-Walled Structures, vol. 75, pp. 87–102, Feb. 2014, doi: 10.1016/J.TWS.2013.10.020.
  21. J. Merrick, G. Hancock, and M. Bamach, “Distortional Buckling Formulae for Thin-Walled Channel and Z-sections with Return Lips,” CCFSS Proceedings of International Specialty Conference on Cold-Formed Steel Structures (1971 - 2018), Oct. 1998, Accessed: Jul. 09, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://scholarsmine.mst.edu/isccss/14iccfsss/14iccfsss-session1/3
  22. K. Buranapunviwat and K. Sojiphan, “Destructive testing and hardness measurement of resistance stud welded joints of ASTM A36 steel,” Mater Today Proc, vol. 47, pp. 3565–3569, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.1016/J.MATPR.2021.03.562.
  23. S. A. Afolalu et al., “Impact of heat treatment on HSS cutting tool (ASTM A600) and its behaviour during machining of mild steel (ASTM A36),” AIP Conf Proc, vol. 1957, no. 1, p. 50003, Apr. 2018, doi: 10.1063/1.5034333/737966.
  24. H. Chen, G. Y. Grondin, and R. G. Driver, “Characterization of fatigue properties of ASTM A709 high performance steel,” J Constr Steel Res, vol. 63, no. 6, pp. 838–848, Jun. 2007, doi: 10.1016/J.JCSR.2006.08.002.
  25. G. Beulah, G. Ananthi, S. Vishuvardhan, and S. Knight, “Experimental, theoretical and numerical study on thin-walled steel single and compound channel sections in axial compression,” IJEMS Vol.22(5) [October 2015], vol. 22, pp. 570–580, 2015, Accessed: Jul. 10, 2024. [Online]. Available: http://nopr.niscpr.res.in/handle/123456789/33440

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.