Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Articles

Vol. 1 No. 2 (2025): International Journal of Rehabilitation & Disability Studies

The Estrophrodite and Androphrodite Archetypes: A Universal Framework for Human Qualities Beyond Gender Roles

  • Chacko P. George
Submitted
January 1, 2026
Published
2025-12-31

Abstract

Human psychological development is shaped by deep archetypal forces that extend beyond biological sex and socially assigned gender roles. This study presents the Estrophrodite and Androphrodite Model (EAM), which proposes that all individuals possess two universal archetypes: estrophrodite qualities—nurturance, emotional depth, relational attunement, and receptivity—and androphrodite qualities—assertiveness, direction, courage, and strategic clarity. Social structures, especially patriarchal norms, frequently distort this natural balance by elevating one archetype while constraining the other, resulting in internal conflict and interpersonal challenges. Drawing on theoretical contributions from Freud, Jung, Adler, Margaret Mead, feminist scholarship, and Indian philosophical traditions, the paper situates archetypal development within a broad cultural and historical frame. Using qualitative clinical case studies, the research illustrates how imbalance between these archetypes contributes to psychosomatic distress, relational instability, and identity fragmentation. Counseling interventions aimed at integrating both archetypal dimensions promote authenticity, emotional regulation, and adaptive functioning. The study offers a culturally sensitive, non-binary framework for understanding personality development and provides actionable insights for clinicians, educators, and policymakers seeking to foster psychological well-being and human potential.

References

  1. Butler, J. (1990). Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. Routledge.
  2. Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1299.
  3. de Beauvoir, S. (1949). The Second Sex. Vintage.
  4. Deutsch, E. (1969). Advaita Vedanta: A philosophical reconstruction. University of Hawaii Press.
  5. Fine, C. (2010). Delusions of Gender: How Our Minds, Society, and Neurosexism Create Difference. W.W. Norton.
  6. Freud, S. (1905/1953). Three Essays on the Theory of Sexuality. Basic Books.
  7. Freud, S. (1923). The Ego and the Id. Norton.
  8. George, C. P. (2025). Healing the Unconscious: Ethics, Shadow, and Catharsis in Practice. Psychology 16.(10) ,45-62.
  9. Jung, C. G. (1953/1959). Psychological Aspects of the Feminine. Princeton University Press.
  10. Mead, M. (1935/1949/1974). Sex and Temperament in Three Primitive Societies. William Morrow.
  11. Rippon, G. (2019). The Gendered Brain. Random House.
  12. Sharma, B. N. K. (2000). Philosophy of Madhvacharya. Motilal Banarsidass.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Most read articles by the same author(s)