Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Articles

Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): Emirati Journal of Civil Engineering and Applications

From Early Literacy to University Retention A Review Paper on Building a Learning Ecosystem in the UAE for Future Civil Engineering Students

  • Maha Alameri
Submitted
February 24, 2026
Published
2026-03-31

Abstract

Success in education is a process that can take decades, and
success in complex engineering education does not start at
the university level. It is far easier to succeed in civil
engineering education if there is a solid foundational system
that includes early literacy and cognitive development. In the
case of the United Arab Emirates, the civil engineering
education system requires a comprehensive pedagogical
framework to strengthen collaborative literacy practices at
the family, school, community, and university levels. This
integrated approach will enhance the cognitive persistence of
future engineering students and improve their retention.
Moreover, aligning educational policies with industry needs
and fostering early exposure to problem, solving, critical
thinking, and STEM, related activities can further strengthen
this ecosystem. Encouraging parental engagement, teacher
training, and community, driven initiatives will create a culture
that values engineering thinking from an early age. Such a
holistic model supports not only academic success but also the
development of resilient, innovative, and industry, ready
graduates capable of contributing to national development
goals.

References

  1. Cabell, S. Q., Justice, L. M., Konold, T. R., &
  2. McGinty, A. S. (2011).
  3. Profiles of emergent literacy skills among
  4. preschool children. Early Childhood Research
  5. Quarterly, 26(1), 1–14.
  6. Meyer, A., Rose, D. H., & Gordon, D. (2014).
  7. Universal design for learning: Theory and
  8. practice. CAST Professional Publishing.
  9. National Early Literacy Panel. (2008).
  10. Developing early literacy: Report of the
  11. National Early Literacy Panel. National
  12. Institute for Literacy.
  13. National Reading Panel. (2000).
  14. Teaching children to read: An evidence, based
  15. assessment of the scientific research
  16. literature and its implications for reading
  17. instruction. National Institute of Child Health
  18. and Human Development.
  19. Snow, C. E., Burns, M. S., & Griffin, P. (1998).
  20. Preventing reading difficulties in young
  21. children. National Academy Press.
  22. Stanovich, K. E. (1986).
  23. Matthew effects in reading: Some
  24. consequences of individual differences in the
  25. acquisition of literacy. Reading Research
  26. Quarterly, 21(4), 360–407.
  27. Teale, W. H., & Sulzby, E. (1986).
  28. Emergent literacy: Writing and reading. Ablex
  29. Publishing. Tinto, V. (2012).
  30. Completing college: Rethinking institutional
  31. action. University of Chicago Press. Vygotsky,
  32. L. S. (1978).
  33. Mind in society: The development of higher
  34. psychological processes. Harvard University
  35. Press. American Society of Civil Engineers.
  36. (2019).
  37. Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge for the
  38. st Century.
  39. National Academy of Engineering. (2004).
  40. The Engineer of 2020: Visions of Engineering
  41. in the New Century (2020).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

<< < 1 2 3 4