Vol. 1 No. 1 (2023): Emirati Journal of Education and Literature
Articles

Tertiary Students’ Perceptions Of Dynamic Written Corrective Feedback In An ESL Classroom In The UAE

PDF
  • Elsayed Mahmoud

Published 2023-06-30

Keywords

  • Feedback,
  • Dynamic Written Corrective Feedback,
  • Classroom Interaction,
  • Writing Tasks,
  • Essays

How to Cite

Tertiary Students’ Perceptions Of Dynamic Written Corrective Feedback In An ESL Classroom In The UAE. (2023). Emirati Journal of Education and Literature, 1(1), 4-17. https://doi.org/10.54878/6s8rz430

Abstract

Although Academic Writing Is An Essential Skill In Learning, It Has Become An Obstacle For Many Students Who Ultimately Apply For The Academic Test To Enroll In A College. Researchers Thought A Lot About Solving This Issue, So They Have Utilized Corrective Feedback In Classroom Practices Since The 1950s. Researchers Were Divided Into Two Categories: The First Agreed With The Feedback, But The Others Disagreed. Four Debatable Questions Have Emerged. Hartshorn Et Al. (2010) Created The Framework. 

PDF

References

  1. Abalkheel, A., & Brandenburg, T. ( (2020). Effects of Written Corrective Feedback: A Synthesis of 10 QuasiExperimental Studies. English Language Teaching,13(7).
  2. AlYousef, E.( 2019). The impact of dynamic written corrective feedback on Arab EFL intermediate students 'writing accuracy: United Arab Emirates University
  3. Altamimi, O. (2014). Dynamic Written Corrective Feedback Revisited: A Critique and an Improved Model. Arab world English journal, 5(3).
  4. Ashwell, T. (2000). Patterns of teacher response to student writing in a multi-draft composition classroom: Is content feedback followed by form feedback the best method? Journal of Second Language Writing, 9, 227–57. https://doi.org /10.1016/S1060-3743(00)00027-8
  5. Bitchener, J., & Knoch, U. (2009). The contribution of written corrective feedback to language development: A ten-month investigation. Applied linguistics, 31(2), 193-214.
  6. Brooks, N. (1960). Language and language learning. Theory and practice. New York: Harcourt, Brace, and World.
  7. Chandler, J. (2003). The efficacy of various kinds of error feedback for improvement in the accuracy and fluency of L2 student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12, 267–296.
  8. Corpuz, V., (2011). Error Correction in Second Language Writing: Teacher’s Beliefs Practices and Students’ Performance. (Unpublished Master dissertation). Queensland University of Technology, Australia.
  9. Conley, D.T. (2007). Toward a more comprehensive conception of college readiness. Eugene, OR: Educational.
  10. Dabaghi, A. (2010). Corrective Feedback in Second Language Acquisition, Theory, Research, and Practice. Lambert Academic Publishing.
  11. Dmitri, L. (2016). Exploring and Reshaping Learners’ Beliefs About the Usefulness of Corrective Feedback: A Socio-cultural Perspective. ITL : International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 167(1), 46-77. https://doi.org/10.1075/itl.167.1.03leo
  12. Ellis, R. , Sheen, Y. , Murakami, M. , & Takashima, H. (2008). The effects of focused and unfocused written corrective feedback in an English as a foreign language context. A system, 36 (3), 353–371.
  13. Ferris, D. (1999). The case for grammar correction in L2 writing classes: A response to Truscott (1996). Journal of second language writing, 8(1), 1–11.
  14. Fithriani R. (2019). ZPD and the Benefits of Written Feedback in L2 Writing: Focusing on Students’ Perceptions. An International Online Journal Volume 19 (1), 63-73.
  15. Ferris, D. R., & Roberts, B. (2001). Error feedback in L2 writing classes: How explicit does it need to be? Journal of Second Language Writing, 10(3), 161–184. Ferris, D. R. (2003). Response to student writing: Implications for second language students. New York: Routledge.
  16. Fathman, A. K. & Whalley, E. (1990). Teacher response to student writing: focus on form versus content. In B. Kroll (ed.) Second Language Writing: Research Insights for the Classroom 178–90. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi. Org /10.1017/CBO9781139524551.016
  17. Fazio, L. (2001). The effects of corrections and commentaries on journal writing of minority- and majority-language minorities. Journal of Second Language Writing, 10, 235–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(01)00042-X
  18. Frear, D. and Chiu, Y. (2015). The effect of focused and unfocused indirect written corrective feedback on EFL learners’ accuracy in new pieces of writing. System, 53, 24–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2015.06.006
  19. Glazier, F. (1994). The Least You Should Know about English Writing Skills. USA: Harcourt Brace College Publishers.
  20. Hartshorn, K. J., & Evans, N. W. (2015). The effects of dynamic written corrective feedback: A 30-week study. Journal of Response to Writing, 1(2),
  21. Hartshorn, K. J., Evans, N. W., Merrill, P. F., Sudweeks, R. R., Strong-Krause, N. E., & Anderson, N. J. (2010). Effects of dynamic corrective feedback on ESL writing accuracy. Tesol Quarterly, 44(1), 84–109.
  22. Jamalinesari, A., Rahimi, F., Gowhary, H., & Azizifar, A.(2015). The Effects of Teacher-Written Direct vs. Indirect Feedback on Students’ Writing. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 192, 116-123. https://doi.org /10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.018
  23. Kamalian, A., & Lashkarian, A. (2014). The Effect of Dynamic Written Corrective Feedback on Iranian Elementary Learners’ Writing. Applied Linguistics & English Literature, 3(5).
  24. Krashen, S. D. (1981). Second language acquisition and second language learning. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
  25. Krashen, S. D. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. New York.
  26. Krashen, S. (1994). The input hypothesis and its rivals. In N. Ellis (Ed.), Implicit and explicit learning of languages. London: Academic Press, 45-77.
  27. Kepner, C. G. (1991). An Experiment in the Relationship of Types of Written Feedback to the Development of Second-Language Writing Skills. The Modern Language Journal, 75(3), 305-313.
  28. Kulhavy, R. W. (1977). Feedback in written instruction. Review of Educational Research, 47(2), 211- 232.
  29. Long, M. H. (1996). The role of the Linguistic Environment in Second Language Acquisition. W. C. Ritchie, & T. K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of Second Language Acquisition. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  30. Lee, S. (2009). The Efficacy of Dynamic Written Corrective Feedback on Intermediate-high ESL Learners ' Writing Accuracy: Brigham Young University.
  31. Lennon, P. (1991). Error: some problems of definition and identification. Applied Linguistics 12 (2), 180–195.
  32. Liu, Y. (2008). The effects of error feedback in second language writing. Arizona Working Papers in SLA and Teaching, 15, 65–79.
  33. Nassaji, H. (2015). The interactional feedback dimension in instructed second language learning. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
  34. Nassaji, H. , & Kartchafa, E.(2017). Corrective Feedback in Second Language Teaching and Learning. New York. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315621432
  35. Rizi, A., & Ketabi,S. (2015). A Close Look at Sixty Years of Corrective Feedback. Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 2( 1).
  36. Richards, J.C., Platt, J. & Webber, H. (1985). Longman Dictionary of Applied Linguistics, London: Longman.
  37. Schwartz, B. (1993). On explicit and negative data effecting and affecting competence and linguistic behavior. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 147–163.
  38. Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11, 129– 158.
  39. Semke, H. D. (1984). Effects of the Red Pen. Foreign Language Annals, 17(3), 195–202.
  40. Shehadeh, A. (1999). Non-native speakers’ production of modified comprehensible output and second language learning. Language Learning, 49(4), 627–675.
  41. Shehadeh, A. (2001). Self- and other-initiated modified output during task-based interaction. TESOL Quarterly, 35(3), 433–457.
  42. Shehadeh, A. (2004). "Encouraging Output". English Teaching Professional, 31, 4–6.
  43. Shehadeh, A. (2003). Learner output, hypothesis testing, and internalizing linguistic knowledge. System, 31, 155–171
  44. Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In S. Gass, & C. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition. Rowley, MA: Newbury House, 235–253
  45. Swain, M. (1995). Three functions of output in second language learning. In G. Cook & B. Seidlhofer (Eds.), Principle and practice in applied linguistics: Studies in honor of H.G. Widdowson. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 125–144.
  46. Swain, M. (1984). A review of immersion education in Canada: Research and evaluation studies. ELT Documents, 119, 35–51.
  47. Swain, M., Lapkin, S. (1995). Problems in output and the cognitive processes they generate: a step towards second language learning. Applied Linguistics 16 (3), 371–391.
  48. Sheppard, K. (1992). Two feedback types: Do they make a difference? RELC Journal: A Journal of Language Teaching and Research in Southeast Asia, 23, 103–110 Suzuki, W., Nassaji, H. and Sato, K. (2019). The effects of feedback explicitness and type of target structure on accuracy in revision and new pieces of writing. System, 81, 135–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2018.12.017
  49. Sheen, Y., Wright, D., & Moldawa, A. (2009). Differential effects of focused and unfocused written correction on the accurate use of grammatical forms by adult ESL learners. A system, 37 (4), 556–569.
  50. Truscott, J. (2001). Selecting Errors for Selective Error Correction. Concentric: Studies in English Literature and Linguistics, 27(2), 225–240.
  51. Truscott, J. (2004). Evidence and Conjecture on the Effects of Correction: A response to Chandler. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13(4), 337–343.
  52. Truscott (1996). Journal of Second Language Writing, 8(1), 1–11.
  53. Truscott, J. and Hsu, A. Y. (2008). Error correction, revision, and learning. Journal of Second Language Writing 17, 292–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2008.05.003
  54. Van Beuningen, C. G., De Jong, N. H. and Kuiken, F. (2008). The effect of direct and indirect corrective feedback on L2 learners’ written accuracy. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 156, 279– 96.https://doi.org/10.1075/itl.156.24beu https://doi.org/10.2143/ITL.156.0.2034439
  55. Van Beuningen C. G., De Jong, N. H. and Kuiken, F. (2012). Evidence on the effectiveness of comprehensive error correction in second language writing. Language Learning, 62, 1–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2011.00674.x