Abstract

This paper makes a unifying argument: a significant share of FinTech innovation is structured as "regulatory nihilism" — a strategic behavior of intentional devaluation of existing normativity when it hinders time-to-market, scalability, and network rent-grabbing. This nihilism is not taken here in a metaphysical sense, but as an institutional translation of a philosophical core: the loss of binding force of values/forms, replaced by performative logics (adoption, growth, liquidity, engagement). In the absence of governance tools capable of operating with times and granularities compatible with digital markets, selective non-compliance becomes rational for the innovator and destabilizing for the system. The main contribution is twofold. First, it proposes a conceptual framework that integrates genealogy of nihilism (Jacobi, Nietzsche, Heidegger) with institutional theory and "code-as-law", formulating the construct of regulatory nihilism as: (i) arbitrage and forum shopping; (ii) temporal non-compliance ("move fast, regularize later"); (iii) cosmetic compliance; (iv) fragmentation of responsibility along the digital stack. Second, he argues that the regulatory sandbox represents — within a certain perimeter — the only realistic tool for containing nihilistic disruption, since it converts anti-institutional energy into experimentation under constraints, observable data and exit rules. Methodology: interdisciplinary theoretical analysis and institutional comparison of sandbox models (FCA-UK, MAS-Singapore, BCB-Brazil) and the European framework (DLT Pilot Regime; MiCA; DORA). The paper develops a set of testable hypotheses and a design grid to assess efficacy, risks (capture, moral hazard, cyber) and transfer conditions from experiment to market. 

References

1. Ahern, D. M. (2020). Regulators nurturing FinTech innovation: Global evolution of the regulatory sandbox as opportunity-based regulation. European Business Organization Law Review, 21, 1–49. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3552015
2. Arner, D. W., Barberis, J., & Buckley, R. P. (2016). The evolution of FinTech: A new post-crisis paradigm? Georgetown Journal of International Law, 47(4), 1271–1319. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2676553
3. Arner, D. W., Barberis, J., & Buckley, R. P. (2017). FinTech, RegTech, and the reconceptualization of financial regulation. Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business, 37(3), 371–413. https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1817&context=njilb
4. Banco Central do Brasil (BCB). (2020). Resolução BCB Nº 29, de 26 de outubro de 2020 (Regulatory Sandbox). https://www.bcb.gov.br/estabilidadefinanceira/exibenormativo?numero=29&tipo=Resolu%C3%A7%C3%A3o+BCB
5. Baudrillard, J. (1994). Simulacra and simulation (S. F. Glaser, Trans.). University of Michigan Press. (Original work published 1981).
6. Carr, K. L. (1992). The banalization of nihilism: Twentieth-century responses to meaninglessness. SUNY Press.
7. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC). (2024, December 4). CFTC releases FY 2024 enforcement results (Press Release No. 9011-24). https://www.cftc.gov/PressRoom/PressReleases/9011-24
8. Cornelli, G., Doerr, S., Gambacorta, L., & Merrouche, O. (2020). Inside the regulatory sandbox: Effects on fintech funding (BIS Working Papers No. 901). https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3753901
9. Cornelli, G., Doerr, S., Gambacorta, L., & Merrouche, O. (2021). Regulatory sandboxes and fintech funding: Evidence from the UK (BIS Working Papers No. 901). Bank for International Settlements. https://www.bis.org/publ/work901.pdf
10. Cornerstone Research. (2024). SEC cryptocurrency enforcement: 2023 update. https://www.cornerstone.com/insights/reports/sec-cryptocurrency-enforcement-2023-update/
11. Cornerstone Research. (2025). SEC cryptocurrency enforcement: 2024 update. https://www.cornerstone.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/SEC-Cryptocurrency-Enforcement-2024-Update.pdf
12. Ehrentraud, J., Ocampo, D. G., Garzoni, L., & Piccolo, M. (2020). Policy responses to FinTech: A cross-country overview (FSI Insights No. 23). Bank for International Settlements. https://www.bis.org/fsi/publ/insights23.pdf
13. European Parliament. (2020). Regulatory sandboxes and innovation hubs for FinTech (IPOL Study 652752). https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2020/652752/IPOL_STU%282020%29652752_EN.pdf
14. European Supervisory Authorities (EBA, EIOPA, ESMA). (2023). Update on the functioning of innovation facilitators – innovation hubs and regulatory sandboxes (ESA 2023 27, December 11, 2023). https://www.esma.europa.eu/sites/default/files/2023-12/ESA_2023_27_Joint_ESAs_Report_on_Innovation_Facilitators_2023.pdf
15. Financial Conduct Authority (FCA). (2017). Regulatory sandbox: Lessons learned report (Cohorts 1 and 2). https://www.fca.org.uk/publication/research-and-data/regulatory-sandbox-lessons-learned-report.pdf
16. Financial Conduct Authority (FCA). (2023). Annual report and accounts 2022/23. https://www.fca.org.uk/publication/annual-reports/annual-report-2022-23.pdf
17. Financial Conduct Authority (FCA). (2024). Annual report and accounts 2023/24. https://www.fca.org.uk/publication/annual-reports/annual-report-2023-24.pdf
18. Galimberti, U. (2007). L’ospite inquietante: Il nichilismo e i giovani. Feltrinelli.
19. Givone, S. (2015). Storia del nulla. Laterza.
20. Heidegger, M. (1953). Die Frage nach der Technik. In Vorträge und Aufsätze. Neske.
21. Heidegger, M. (1961). Nietzsche (Vols. 1–2). Neske.
22. Jacobi, F. H. (1799). Sendschreiben an Fichte (Letter to Fichte). In Fichtiana (modern editions).
23. Leopardi, G. (1997). Zibaldone. (Critical editions).
24. Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS). (2018). FinTech regulatory sandbox guidelines (updated February 19, 2018). https://www.mas.gov.sg/-/media/MAS/Smart-Financial-Centre/Sandbox/FinTech-Regulatory-Sandbox-Guidelines-19Feb2018.pdf
25. Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS). (2019). Sandbox Express guidelines (August 7, 2019). https://www.mas.gov.sg/-/media/MAS/Smart-Financial-Centre/Sandbox-Express/Sandbox-Express-Guidelines-7-Aug.pdf
26. Nietzsche, F. (1882). Die fröhliche Wissenschaft.
27. Nietzsche, F. (1883–1885). Also sprach Zarathustra.
28. Nietzsche, F. (1887). Zur Genealogie der Moral.
29. Regulation (EU) 2022/858 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2022 on a pilot regime for market infrastructures based on distributed ledger technology. Official Journal of the European Union. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2022/858/oj/eng
30. Regulation (EU) 2022/2554 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 December 2022 on digital operational resilience for the financial sector (DORA). Official Journal of the European Union. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2022/2554/oj/eng
31. Regulation (EU) 2023/1114 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 May 2023 on markets in crypto-assets (MiCA). Official Journal of the European Union. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2023/1114/oj/eng
32. Severino, E. (1995). L’essenza del nichilismo. Adelphi.
33. Trifiletti, M. (2025). The challenge of integrating Artificial Intelligence in Anti-Money Laundering. Journal of Economics, Finance and Management (JEFM), 4(3), 777-788.
34. Vattimo, G. (2003). Nihilism and emancipation: Ethics, politics, law. Garzanti.
35. Volpi, F. (2004). Il nichilismo. Laterza.
36. World Bank. (2020). Global experiences from regulatory sandboxes. https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/912001605241080935/pdf/Global-Experiences-from-Regulatory-Sandboxes.pdf
37. Zetzsche, D. A., Buckley, R. P., Arner, D. W., & Barberis, J. N. (2017). From FinTech to TechFin: The regulatory challenges of data-driven finance. NYU Journal of Law & Business, 14, 393–446. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2959925
38. Zetzsche, D. A., Buckley, R. P., Arner, D. W., & Barberis, J. N. (2020). Decentralized finance (DeFi). Journal of Financial Regulation, 6(2), 172–203. https://doi.org/10.1093/jfr/fjaa010