Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Articles

Vol. 3 No. 2 (2024): Emirati Journal of Business, Economics, & Social Studies

Bilateral Treaties and International Regulations: A Systematic Literature Review

  • Waled Bin Wabar
Submitted
August 9, 2024
Published
2024-08-09

Abstract

This qualitative systematic literature review aimed to explore the factors that may oblige the formulation of the international regulatory framework for countries in bilateral treaties. It can be concluded from this study that bilateral treaties do not alleviate all the problems that are associated with international engagement. Despite having bilateral treaties, nations still struggle with major issues that lead to disputes. This has been evidenced by the scholarly evidence indicating the need.

References

  1. Adhikary, B. K. (2017). Factors influencing foreign direct investment in South Asian economies: A comparative analysis. South Asian Journal of Business Studies, 6(1), 8-37.
  2. Aguerre, C. (2019). Digital trade in Latin America: mapping issues and approaches. Digital Policy, Regulation and Governance, 21(1), 2-18.
  3. Ahlers, R., Brandimarte, L., Kleemans, I., & Sadat, S. H. (2014). Ambitious development on fragile foundations: Criticalities of current large dam construction in Afghanistan. Geoforum, 54(3), 49-58.
  4. Ahtik, M., Pilipovic, O., & Marelja, M. (2019). Economic analysis of money laundering prevention in Croatia and Slovenia. Journal of Money Laundering Control, 22(1), 97-109.
  5. Al-Tawil, T. N. E., & Younies, H. (2021). The implications of the Brexit from EU and bitcoin. Journal of Money Laundering Control, 24(1), 137-149.
  6. Andrés, A. R., & Asongu, S. (2016). Global trajectories, dynamics, and tendencies of business software piracy: benchmarking IPRs harmonization. Journal of Economic Studies, 43(5), 780-800.
  7. Asongu, S. (2014). Software piracy, inequality and the poor: evidence from Africa. Journal of Economic Studies.
  8. Atkins, J. (2013). A renewed social democracy for an ‘Age of Internationalism’: An interpretivist account of new labour's foreign policy. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 15(2), 175-191.
  9. Ayentimi, D. T., Burgess, J., & Brown, K. (2018). HRM practices of MNEs and domestic firms in Ghana: divergence or convergence?. Personnel Review.
  10. Bandelj, N., & Tester, A. (2020). Amplified Decoupling in the Global Economy: The Case of Bilateral Investment Treaties. Socius, 6(2), 2378023120969343.
  11. Beri, P. B., & Nubong, G. F. (2021). Impact of bilateral investment treaties on foreign direct investment in Africa. African Development Review, 33(3), 439-451.
  12. Bhardwaj, R. K., & Margam, M. (2017). Metadata framework for online legal information system in indian environment. Library Review, 66(1/2), 49-68.
  13. Chemmanur, T. J., Hull, T. J., & Krishnan, K. (2016). Do local and international venture capitalists play well together? The complementarity of local and international venture capitalists. Journal of Business Venturing, 31(5), 573-594.
  14. Chen, V. Z., Li, Y., & Hambright, S. (2016). Regulatory institutions and Chinese outward FDI: an empirical review. Multinational Business Review, 24(4), 302-333.
  15. Choi, W. M. (2015). Composing an Investment Chapter of the Korea-China-Japan FTA: A Quest for Better International Investment Governance? Journal of International Logistics and Trade, 13(2),
  16. Cuervo-Cazurra, A., & Li, C. (2021). State ownership and internationalization: The advantage and disadvantage of stateness. Journal of World Business, 56(1), 101112.
  17. Danzer, A. M., & Yaman, F. (2016). Ethnic concentration and language fluency of immigrants: Evidence from the guest-worker placement in Germany. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 131(3), 151-165.
  18. Denyer, D. and Tranfield, D. (2009), “Producing a systematic review”, in Buchanan, D.A. and Bryman, A. (Eds), The Sage Handbook of Organizational Research Methods, Sage, London, pp. 671-689.
  19. Dezalay, S. (2019). Lawyers and the “new extraction” in Africa. International Journal of Social Economics.
  20. Dostál, J. (2021). Assigning a Value to Volunteering in Requests for Proposals. SAGE Open, 11(2), 21582440211009503.
  21. Frenkel, M., & Walter, B. (2019). Do bilateral investment treaties attract foreign direct investment? The role of international dispute settlement provisions. The World Economy, 42(5), 1316-1342.
  22. Gibbs, T. (2018). Making sure crime does not pay: Recent efforts to tackle corruption in Dubai: the 2016 creation of the Dubai Economic Security Centre. Journal of Money Laundering Control, 12(3),1-19.
  23. Hagiwara, R. (2022). Key challenges facing the rule of law in Hong Kong. Social Transformations in Chinese Societies, 18(1), 88-103.
  24. Hamm, B. (2015). The end of democracy as we knew it. Foresight.
  25. Heid, B., &Vozzo, I. (2020). The international trade effects of bilateral investment treaties. Economics Letters, 196, 109569.
  26. Heidari, A. (2022). The regulations concerning the protection of the national security of the host country and the legitimate expectations of the foreign investments. Journal of International Trade Law and Policy, 21(2), 122-139.
  27. Hur, N. (2015). Investment Promotive Effects of Mega-FTAs on the Cooperative Game for Eurasia Initiative. Journal of International Logistics and Trade, 13(3), 113-131.
  28. Idrees, R. Q., Shapiee, R., & Ahamat, H. (2019). Paradigm shift; the emergence of arbitral forum shopping in CPEC investment disputes. Journal of International Trade Law and Policy, 18(3), 136-151.
  29. Islam, M. D., Kaplan, W. A., Trachtenberg, D., Thrasher, R., Gallagher, K. P., & Wirtz, V. J. (2019). Impacts of intellectual property provisions in trade treaties on access to medicine in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review. Globalization and Health, 15(1), 1-14.
  30. Kudrle, R. T. (2021). Moves and countermoves in the digitization challenges to international taxation. Technology in Society, 64(2), 101453.
  31. Lee, H. S., Chong, S. C., Yap, S., Sia, B. K., & Chen, Y. X. (2021). Does Economic Freedom in Host Countries Lead to Increased Non-Life Insurance Development? SAGE Open, 11(4), 21582440211054486.
  32. Li, D., Chen, X., & Wohlfarth, P. (2022). Public participation, investment networks, and China's outward FDI: Evidence from 58 countries along the belt and road. Emerging Markets Review, 51(2), 100887.
  33. Li, S., Zhao, L., & Shen, H. (2021). Foreign direct investment and institutional environment: the impact of bilateral investment treaties. Applied Economics, 53(30), 3535-3548.
  34. Monticelli, J. M., Garrido, I. L., & de Vasconcellos, S. L. (2018). Coopetition and institutions: a strategy for Brazilian wineries facing internationalization. International Journal of Wine Business Research, 27(3), 1-9
  35. Monticelli, J. M., Garrido, I. L., Vieira, L. M., Chim-Miki, A. F., & Carneiro, J. (2022). Can competitors cooperate? The impact of formal institution agents in promoting coopetition among emerging market exporters. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 37(9), 1915-1932.
  36. Mugarura, N. (2016). The “EU Brexit” implication on a single banking license and other aspects of financial markets regulation in the UK. International Journal of Law and Management, 58(4), 468-483.71-90.
  37. Obadina, D. A. (2016). Confronting the problem of cross-border tax evasion in an era of greater global transparency of tax relevant information: The case of Nigeria. Journal of Money Laundering Control, 19(4), 470-499.
  38. Okah-Avae, T. O., & Mukoro, B. (2020). Constructing a tax regime for the regulation of trade in digital content. Journal of International Trade Law and Policy, 19(3), 121-138.
  39. Olujobi, O. J. (2021). Recouping proceeds of corruption: is there any need to reverse extant trends by enacting civil forfeiture legal regime in Nigeria? Journal of Money Laundering Control, 24(4), 806-833.
  40. Phuong, N. Q., & Venkatesh, S. (2015). Does migration make financial sense? The case of domestic workers from Vietnam to Taiwan. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 35(11/12), 722-737.
  41. Roehling, M. (2017). The important but neglected legal context of virtual teams: Research implications and opportunities. Human Resource Management Review, 27(4), 621-634.
  42. Sakal, H. B. (2021). Turkey’s energy trade relations with Europe: The role of institutions and energy market. Energy & Environment, 32(7), 1243-1274.
  43. Schittenhelm, K. (2022). Negotiating unequal mobility opportunities: Young academics’ mobility in the EU and their partner-related living arrangements. Geoforum, 133(2), 117-127.
  44. Sharmin, T., & Laryea, E. (2021). Application of MFN to investment dispute settlement: rule of law issues. Journal of International Trade Law and Policy, 20(1), 21-41.
  45. Sielker, F. (2018). The European Commission’s proposal for a cross-border mechanism (ECBM): Potential implications and perspectives. Journal of Property, Planning and Environmental Law, 10(3), 219-239.
  46. Suttle, O. (2022). The puzzle of competitive fairness. Politics, Philosophy & Economics, 21(2), 190-227.
  47. Varshney, D., & Lata, S. (2014). Female migration, education and occupational development: A geospatial analysis of Asian countries. Environment and Urbanization Asia, 5(1), 185-215.
  48. Wang, S. J. (2021). Tackling suspect wealth: towards an accountable and transparent future?. Journal of Money Laundering Control, 24(2), 246-256.
  49. Ye, F. (2020). The impact of bilateral investment treaties (BITs) on collective labor rights in developing countries. The Review of International Organizations, 15, 899-921.
  50. Ye, F. (2020). The impact of bilateral investment treaties (BITs) on collective labor rights in developing countries. The Review of International Organizations, 15(4), 899-921.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Similar Articles

1-10 of 12

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 5 > >>