Abstract

The aim of this study is to provide educational actors with alternative teaching practices and planning perspectives. We aim to establish this through our quest to answer an odd, yet plausible question. During our investigation, we learnt that the demonstration of “Problem Walk” may be used as an indicator to anticipate students’ academic performance degradation. We selected 30 students who exhibit signs of a "problem walk," looked up for their records and prepared a dossier to examine. The results showed that 80% of students who demonstrated "problem walk" appeared to have weak academic performance. The findings revealed that students who walk in the same way have had a history of troubled relationships with their teachers in addition to their low school performance.

References

1. Positive Behavioral Interventions & Supports (PBIS). (n.d.). Retrieved February 24, 2023, from Positive Behavioral Interventions & Supports (PBIS): https://www.pbis.org/topics/classroom-pbis
2. Richard, Bond, & Stokes-Zoota. (2003). One hundred Years of Social Psychology Quantitatively Discribed. Educational Publishing Foundation. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.7.4.331
3. Albert Bandura, D. R. (1963). VICARIOUS REINFORCEMENT AND IMITATIVE. Journal oj Abnormal and Social Psychology, 601-607. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0045550
4. Albert Bandura. Richard H Walters. (1963). Social Learning and Personality Development. NEW YORK: HOLT, RINEHART AND WINSTON INC.
5. Bandura, A. (1977). Social Learning Theory. General Learning Press, 46.
6. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Cambridge University Press, xiii + 617 pp.
7. Baumgartner, J. J. (2012). You are What You Wear. Da Capo Press.
8. Camille A. Farrington, Melissa Roderick, Elaine Al. (2012, June). The Role of Noncognitive Factors in Shaping School Performance. Chicago: Univesity of Chicago Consortium on Chicago School Research.
9. Darwin, C. (1872). The Expression of Emotion in Man and Animals. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/10001-000
10. Duckworth, a. S. (2005). Self-discipline outdoes IQ in predicting academic performance of adolescents. Psychological Science, 939-44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01641.x
11. Furkas, G. (2003). Cognitive skills and noncognitive traits and behaviors in stratification process. Annual Review of Sociology, 541-562. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.29.010202.100023
12. Harmer, J. (2015). The Practice of English Language Teaching (Third Edition ed.). Longman.
13. Merton, R. (1940). Bureacratic Structure and Personality> . DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2570634
14. S. T. Fiske, D. T. Gilbert, & G. Lindzey. (2010). Interpersonal stratification: Status, power, and subordination. Handbook of Social Psychology, 941-981. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470561119.socpsy002026
15. Spielberger. (1966). Theory and Reasearch on Anxiety and Behavior. Academic Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-1-4832-3131-0.50006-8
16. Zimmerman, R. a. (1978). Social Learning and Cognition. New York: Academic Press, 338.
17. الزعل, ر. (1993). مقدمة في علم النفس الإجتماعي و السلوك التنظيمي. دار قتيبة للطباعة.